To clerify what I ment, those who questioned Under and had information outside of his skewed reports did not think he was reliable, however from my observation this was not the majority of members. Many members relied on Under for information for one reson or another. Those of us that did have outside information would protest but most of the time we would either be ignored or sometimes argued down.
Underlord was funtionally leader until Matt returned, upon return plans were made to soft reboot the allience; elections were held for the low gov (not matt, underlord ect). Underlord was removed following a disagreement and the new gov was made official.
Thats a rough timeline from my perspective, I admit I do not have the full story. Either way what can we do to show you we mean business?