Jump to content

Theodosius

Members
  • Posts

    592
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Posts posted by Theodosius

  1. 57 minutes ago, Buorhann said:

    This is an absolute bad statement to make.  Only one of those listed had any actual backroom experience with Keegoz.

    I'd say it's plenty. You'll notice he doesn't want to talk about that. However, playing dumb and being disingenuous in front of my face is not my cup of tea and certainly insulting my intelligence isn't either, so I've largely elected to not participate in this discussion and keep lowering my opinion about certain people. I hope it's worth it Keeg. Y'all keep going now, don't want to interrupt further.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
  2. 6 hours ago, Keegoz said:

    You literally showed a log that proceeded me outlining why I wanted to sign TI over other alliances because I was worried about Rose's influence. One that was then cancelled once tCW was dealt with. Boyce and this, you really are struggling to keep this cb afloat.

    As for the rest, I'm truly glad we're back to this forum being wild conspiracy theories with no evidence. Don't forget your tinfoil hat friend.

    Let's call this for what it is. A poor excuse and distraction from your FA failings and a cb that is being made up on the run. You'd rather blame others and make up wild stories than accept you made mistakes. If you don't think you've made any mistakes though, continue on your current course.

    *looks around*
    *puts my hat on*

    I have heard there is a mother in distress present in this location. I have come to rescue.

    Why are both you and the alleged father (who I'm told is named Abbas) vehemently denying to undergo a DNA test as it pertains to this child of light, born out of wedlock?

    Would you not wish for the child you have sired to have a father presence, Keegoz?

    Would that child not benefit from its fatherly figure?

    What about alimony support? Is he at least sending you a guilt-induced monthly check to keep the baby fed? Is he still harassing you on facebook?

    I'm happy to take up your case and be your solicitor in this matter. Runaway dads are NO good. 

    696969-1389, ask for office of the Attorney Drunkface. 

    • Like 1
    • Haha 3
  3. Suggestion updated to reflect the feedback about treasure min-maxing. Not being able to buy a treasure if you already have one will prevent whale min-maxing, while at the same time it wouldn't interfere with people obtaining treasures via war or RNG spawn, where it would be incredibly rare to find yourself holding 2 treasures, either during a war when they're basically worthless, or having some rare luck with the RNG.

  4. 31 minutes ago, Prefontaine said:

    You can see my post on the first page of the thread. I am for more ways of gaining project slots. Alex is not. I'm often advocating for such but when he decides one way or another on something it is what it is.

    When the change rolls live what Alex and I discussed was every leadership role gets defaulted to no authority except any nations in the top spot. Those nations will have all boxes checked for what they can have the power to do. From there they can check boxes for different ranks as they see fit.

    Treasure trading will not be added to this current update. It's been a while since I last talked to Alex about it and I don't remember his stance on it. I'll mention it next time we talk. 

    Mhm. More ways of acquiring extra project slots are definitely needed considering this puts us at 13 new projects with this update. 

    As for the treasures, yeah as I said, don't expect it this update as its obviously gonna happen soon. To prevent hijacking the thread, I started a new topic about it here 

     

  5. 48 minutes ago, Prefontaine said:

     

    • Additional project slot for wars fought. Alex, as I have mentioned, isn't the biggest fan on non-infra based project slots. Thus we've removed the two and created a single in the middle of the two. 1 slot at 100 total wars won/lost. Wars that expire do not currently add to this metric. 

    An idea of unlocking further 2 project slots was good, albeit the means of procuring it being weird. If I'm not mistaken, recently there have been 9 (am I counting this right?) new projects added to the game. This update will bring that number up to 13. We have in turn seen only one free project slot awarded to the base limit. So maybe add another one, or two free slots to the base limit and keep this metric as well? People are struggling with slots as it is, and rarely anyone is fond of the idea to go 3000 infra just to unlock more slots.

     

    Quote
    • Editing Tax Brackets

    Does this include moving people off and on different brackets? Perhaps a level that allows editing the control panel permissions itself, or is this assumed to be in the top role (Leader)?

    Everything else sounds fine on the permission list and I commend the QoL additions that will be added.

     

    As far as the trading topic goes, I would like to remind everyone that the old way of treasure trading has been prohibited for a good while now (its been months, right?), and the supposed system that was gonna replace that has not been mentioned since the day treasure transfers by war have been banned. So I will quote a rather old suggestion from last year about this:

    Quote

     

    Personal trade offers for buying and selling treasures.

    - Nation to nation treasure offers. One side gets the money, the other receives the treasure.

    - 5 day cooldown on treasure movement

    - If the treasure bearer is blockaded, the treasure can not be traded.

     

    So perhaps something worth adding to the docket for the next update?

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.