George Clooney

So when faced with a group of alliances that have the potential to act in concert to suppress any smaller opposing bloc, what do you recommend? Hope they'll accept your offer of a NAP? Or maybe see who else sees the threat like you and then band together with them to create a much larger bloc to eliminate or reduce that threat?

Mazel Tov. Now go contemplate world peace together over a caffeinated beverage.

dnn

dnn

Concise, to the point. Includes a tl;dr for those who have a micro attention span. 10/10 Good luck and have fun out there.

Seems clear enough. Good luck and have fun.

It will come out in due time if it isn't already common knowledge. I suspect that it already has in certain circles though. FYI: S&B isn't friendless.

This could be a cool thing or a game breaking thing that will make it tougher for newer nations to catch up with older nations. That said, I think as I see some examples for the sorts of things you have in mind and their effect, I'll have some input for you.

Dinitronaphthalene

dnn

I conducted an audit for my own nation, and perhaps if everyone else did that it might help out Alex, then again it could also inundate him the admin staff with requests. An automated audit of all nations achievements would probably be best. Also a check of current scripts to make sure they are working properly (clearly at least one isn't) is also in order.

If a war is won in the opening blitz, that war was probably a duck roll and lopsided from the first war dec. I will admit I had some serious concerns about the changes. But having fought some wars under them on Test, it does mean that you'll see more Moderate successes than you have in the past all other numbers of units being the same, but that's ok. We all could benefit from having additional wars that are a bit more competitive.

Thanks again.

Yipes, last time I saw something like that, I was fighting vampires in a Mexican bar.

I'd like it to be known that I am not a member of the Titans government, don't know anyone in Titan, and would turn down any offer to join their government, not that anyone is likely to ask, but would accept $5 million if offered with no strings attached.

Whelp, more lines drawn.

Found another missing one: I SEE YOU (Build the Spy Satellite National Project), which I purchased some time ago.

That's unfortunate. She seemed like such a good sport.

Seems like you are purposely fattening the chickens a bit for the foxes, and that may have unintended consequences down the road, but I like it in principle if the intent is to encourage activity and hopefully prevent more people from playing a few weeks, sitting back and saying the words you never want to hear: "I'm bored".

Mistake? No. My point was to agree with Keegoz. If you're unsure about your further participation or simply know that you won't be around, there is a remedy other than quitting. Indeed, you're more likely to return if you go into VM than if you have to start from scratch. That said, SRD has a point though. People who simply disappear for three month aren't playing. Statistically speaking, most are typically for good.

I am quite literally here because Vacation Mode exists. I walked away unsure I'd ever return. Numbers don't lie and the majority of people who are gone over 3 months never return. The numbers are worse for newer and smaller nations.

Thank you, kindly.

Given the large number of nations that were essentially producing resources on autopilot (and shouldn't have been around), how could eliminating them not cause radical changes in resource production? Seems like something that should have been foreseen.

'Wiki Mod' so it checks out. 🙃