Felkey

The bots shall form a council and rule in our place

Pretty sure it's already reserved, and then another one 6 months after that and on and on it goes....

Like I told zues, we gotta schedule these things in advance, I have another vacation planned for 6 months from now as well.

I didn't realize you cared so much, I ❤️ you too

You misunderstood me, I said I'm leaving in a couple days ?

I'm gonna be drinking my ass off on a beach in a couple days, care for a drink? Name your poison.

Should be honored I consider you a pet you ungrateful cat thing ?

I think we might need it against this daunting foe

Hi, reminder to put it in picture format because @Sargun can't read

Just because you chose to ignore the points they made doesn't mean they didn't make them. Maybe you should try bringing up Pantheon again.

Tbf, shifty's credibility is somewhere below that of a tabloid/conspiracy theorist. Pumping out irrelevant info or pure bs is kinda his thing

Pineapple and ham or pineapple and bbq chicken on pizza is great.

But GoB is 3 fewer letters and typing those extra letters would be :effort:

Don't join anyone, just delete.

Valid CB: that grammar

There were numerous members with hundreds of millions in cash alone and 60-100k resources on hand that we were able to keep perma blocaded until we looted most of their stuff, so while there may have been one big loot job on tkr's bank, all those individual but still sizable loots still stacked up

Size, especially length, matters

Here's a statement that I never thought would come out of my mouth.... I agree with Horsecock.

In regards to term number two, I hope to be seeing this very soon on their alliance page.

Where did I specify TCW? I've mostly used "we". I'm also pretty sure we were indirectly mentioned as tkr and friends. Even if we weren't we would be obligated to defend them.

Are you trying to drown out the key facts with irrelevant details again? Are you now denying you would have defended KT in the event we attacked only them? If he was baited into talking about tkr, that's his problem.

If someone is planning to murder me and I shoot them when they are staking my house I don't think you would find many juries to convict me once the evidence of their plot was exposed.

A preemptive strike can be any time before a confirmed threat intends on taking action. It doesn't matter if it's 2 days or 2 months. The timeframe doesn't matter, all that matters is we have your ally's high gov saying they plan on hitting us (that's not really paranoia, it's reading comprehension). As for hitting tgh buorhann has already stated he would have defended them anyways, something we assumed and so we decided to hit you anyways. So if anything buorhann has implicated himself, so excellent job. As for calling people out, the most you guys have done is spout random BS concocted with limited thought at best. The crap you guys spray on the forums really has nothing to do with it.

Pay special attention to that horsecock guy, you know, the one who happens to be your ally's head of milcom.

Are we? I'd argue that a preemptive strike is not really agressive but a necessity based on the information received prior to the strike. You know what they say, the best defense is a good offensive, and that is particularly true in this situation. Should we have waited for KT to rally a gang together to come and hit us first? Attacking because someone else forces you to do so does not make you the aggressors, it makes you reactive.