Smith

This is wonderful. Of course, this is certainly worth it

Offer for $10M has been sent. Please change your name to "I love Slack" and your avatar to the Slack logo.

Congratulation on the merge. I think you guys are on track to be the first protectorate in the #1 spot

This is propaganda

Is that you Keshav?

Please remove that guinea pig from your profile picture. It brings back bad memories

I really enjoyed that week we had before permawar began

Going from Pika as leader to Kev? 72 hours

I miss the old BK, straight from OO BK The Yoso BK, set on his ayy BK I hate the new BK, the IQ BK The Comrade Milton BK, spaz in the OWF BK I miss the funny BK, making memes BK I gotta say, at that time I'd like to treaty BK See, I grew up with BK, it wasn't any BKs And now I look and look around and there's so many BKs I used to love BK, I used to love BK I even had the ayy lmao bot, I thought I was BK What if BK made a song about BK Called "We don't want a new hegemoney"? Man, that'd be so BK That's all it was BK, we still love BK And I love you like BK loves BK

Goodbye fellow pigeon

Whatever you did Squeegee deserves worse

Many of the people that were banned for 6 months have been playing nation sims for 10 years. In fact, Keshav justified intentionally driving people out of the game by saying he didn't want to find himself with regret 10 years from now. So yes, I worry that this is a slap on the wrist and the benefit they got from the alleged cheating outweighs this 6 month ban.

Isn't the most non-partisan action you can take to enforce rules equally regardless of side? For example when Nova cheated the people proven to be involved were permanently banned if I recall correctly. Shouldn't the same thing be done here now that another side has done it?

I haven't reviewed the information yet but if this is true 6 months seems like a lenient punishment considering the permanent bans that have been handed out in the past. Why was that not the case here for such massive fraud? @Alex

? ? ? ? ? ?

?????

Weird normally IQ only tries lobbying admins/mods in DMs

>Form AA and almost immediately join in on a massive dogpile >Complain about bandwagoning when the fight becomes more even Oh the horror

Hamster guy: It doesn't matter what people think of us Also hamster guy: I will literally never stop arguing or admit I may have made a mistake somewhere

The TKR/TCW split was fake

You realize I can just post logs showing you are lying right? Early November here is NPO amongst others discussing how to stall peace talks: underlordgc11/3/2019, 7:55:58 AM Anyways, I can give a link to kertogibdvsujs to join the peace server underlordgc11/3/2019, 7:56:43 AM And we can just stall them by saying we want people to get organized or some random bs like that ### TheNG11/1/2019, 4:46:18 PM I mean there’s plenty of ways to slow down talks TheNG11/1/2019, 4:46:29 PM We have reps demands in our back pocket TheNG11/1/2019, 4:46:40 PM The various humiliating joke terms ### Leo the Great11/1/2019, 6:01:53 PM I don’t think the discussion was about about actually finding peace Leo the Great11/1/2019, 6:02:08 PM Rather two different ways of prolonging it till they are dead Roquentin11/1/2019, 6:02:17 PM ah Roquentin11/1/2019, 6:02:26 PM well the not including thme is a goood stlal tactic Leo the Great11/1/2019, 6:02:33 PM Drag peace talks vs insist on separating them Roquentin11/1/2019, 6:02:44 PM separate talks for anyone not kertchogg proper --- A couple weeks later here is NPO amongst others blaming us for peace talks not going fast after planning to make them slow: They even made the argument that they were trying to increase the speed of peace talks while secretly planning to do the opposite

Yes there were more October logs as we were only halfway into November when this thread was made, but the logs continue into November showing their intent. However, it kinda seems like no matter what answer we give you or how much evidence we provide you there doesn't seem to be a scenario in which you would accept that the blame lies with your leadership. Am I wrong on this? Because I've pointed out multiple misconceptions that you have had and you seem to just move the goal post. If we prove that they were still doing things in November then you say that you thought it was mostly happening in October. If we show it's not from a third party you say the person is untrustworthy. Then you say we must have paid or promised them something. We are providing tons of evidence for our claims while you make assumptions such as this with no proof whatsoever. Why is that?

The "third party" was a member of your coalition leadership which actually makes him a first party as he was directly involved. It is not "may or may not" as they directly say they don't want the war to end. We know their views did not change after October because we have logs in November which is when this thread was created showing they were still trying to stall peace. And again, while they were doing this in private they were publicly blaming us for peace not progressing.

The logs were necessary because your coalition's leadership was publicly blaming us for no progress being made in peace talks while in private were strategizing on how to drag out the peace process for as long as possible to make as many people quit out of boredom on our side as they could. It's not acceptable to gaslight somebody and expect them to just sit back and take the abuse. The blame here is on your leadership for developing a strategy specifically designed to pressure people out of the game. It's not on us for to standing up to people telling intentional lies. This war has been going on for like 7 months, there is no reason for anybody to believe that your coalition leadership was going to change their tactics when they were still lying about what they were doing. Keep in mind that during the period that you are saying we should have still been trying to negotiate they were still trying to think of ways to drag the war out. The only option we had left when shown that your leadership was trying to delay talks to get everybody to quit was at least show what they were saying isn't true.