Bhuto

They would get the message after the DoW ofc.

hushhhhh!!!!!! #Dynamic

lmao xD

tbf this is sort of well-known stuff since that bk war co-ordination form got leaked. but honestly if t$-npo do join on the dogpiling I will be disappointed.

lololol so when's the fight starting ?

All are awesome but I doubt if Alex is at all willing to even read it....

Wow really like this new minisphere of bk.... Way to go boys

I hate to admit but you are absolutely right......... Like only thing that connecting me with current game is bunch of old friends i like to hangout with..... there has to be some major changes in the gameplay and stuffs..... litreally nothing changed in last what 3-4 years apart from one minor war mechanics shift...... it's nice that we have lots of good FA minded people to make things interesting but I guess its high time that more updates comes our way...... I dont think we are yet in a point of no return for this game but we are approaching it no doubt about that.

If this is true (which I hardly think is) Kudos to bk for trying to shift dynamic of the game twice by making non-conventional moves. Hail Ayyslam

Peace is not worth it Orbis people. We have come here to free you from stupid and meaningless peace and give you monthly rolling ❤️ With love, Over lord of the lunatics Bhuto.

you are confusing me with someone who actually gives a shit

o/Rose Good luck Vack/Noytal/Reinhard Von Musel ^-^

lmao so you are basically a pet of bk?

sad to see TKR-tcw breakup it was a looong lasting tie but all good things must come to an end ? Also why is this guy log-dumping ?

ah that makes sense that is absolutely false ...... sometimes your perspective makes you think someone is being a troll but just think as an independent persona there was a pretty good reason why some old players had a good support base.

forum always contains some trolls if there are quality posters then no one gives a damn about the trolls imo

Hey, people, some of you know that I came back sometime (3 months) ago and one of the visible change I noticed from the 2016-17 era is that this forum is pretty less active (won't use the word inactive). Although in-game and in discord many alliances seemed to be hyper-active. So any particular reason why? I am particularly missing long Orbis Central threads about in-game politics ? .... Now easily could have asked this to a few old friends but really want everyone's opinion here

Congrats I am sure you guys would make a great partner Annnnnd on a lighter tone.... #Syndisphere_is_back_boiz

Good luck to the parties involved

I came I read And I understand nothing ..... Nothing makes sense anymore..... /cries alone ??

Goals= Not to have any goals and disband #just_polaris_things

Merge dark brotherhood and GoG #Entente_Forever xD

Don't let others discourage you mate create your own alliance and name it GPA and buy protection from other established AA xD On a serious note try out raiding once atleast, then you will ask for alliance that allows to raid anyone ?

War length are in general determined by set of goals the agressors went out to achieve [given the agressor wins] and the amount of damage the defending AA thinks is good enough for the agressors to teach a lesson [given the defending AA wins]. Now as for orbis wide scale a war that is coming as a total surprise to the defending one are very low [probably need to go far back to silent war but still it was obvious back then that a war is coming only the sides were not clear enough]. So having said that we can safely assume that even before the war begins both sides have sort of an idea about what they are trying to achieve. Oh by the way keep those meme terms out of discussion they are more for fun rather than anything else. Now coming to the main topic why the war length is increasing? It's simple previously alliances had 3/4 nations in 20-25 city range whom they can rely on to generate revenue even when a massive war is going on now top tiers are in the region of 30+ cities, But still the main fight occurs in the 13-18 city level which is more or less same as earlier case. So the thing is both side gets enough fuel to fight out wars in the middle tier than it was before, And in addition to that what happens at the end of the war is when a side knows that they can't win they simply start nuking now in the past when whales are rolled and started nuking they would hit cities of say 13-15 level with some 1.2k-1.5k infra so nukes doesn't mattered much but again now the time has changed when you are ZIed and ZMed and you nuke a 20 city folk with 2k-2.5k infra per city you actually start making positive damage and if you have a bank to guarantee your rebuild then keep on nuking is a better term than agreeing to reps (btw any AA gave out more than 1bn reps till now? just asking i wasn't around for some time) or some term that hurts your "Ego". Now what are my personal opinions? I think war length totally depends on your target set . if you can achieve your target after 2 round it's best to peace out , if you need to fight for 1 year to get your terms so be it. And as a concluding remark I would say I strongly believe all top AA leaders thinks about their own members first (unless he/she is a stupid) , If he/she feels that their alliance is loosing activity level , good members due their own egoistic issues they will and must peace out ASAP.

Lmao you actually believed this ?