Prefontaine

100%

With the recent events involving the raiders coming to an end, some nations have been left decimated in the wake after facing unfair odds. I propose, as a community, we help these nations rebuild. What this means is coming together as a community and giving money to other nations that may not be in our own alliance. This is how I propose we do this, Each alliance states if they're willing to participate. Of the alliances participating you list how many nations of yours engaged in war against the raiders and provide links to such nations. For one day, each alliance participating will set their alliance tax rate to 50% and we shall pool all of those funds and I calculate an even amount to send to everyone who fought. Should we do this, I will handle the paperwork aspect of crunching the numbers and assigning which alliances should be sending to which nations. Is anyone interested?

Everything's still zeros for cash, Sheepy.

So both of the alliances that were created in out of Guardian membership who left because "The alliance was collapsing and wasn't going to survive", are already gone?

I'll try it sometime within the next 24 hours.

http://politicsandwar.com/alliance/id=619&display=banktaxes I set the alliance tax rate to %100 for 3 collections, the resources were collected, but no money. And nations didn't gain any cash either. So effectively it cost the alliance somewhere in the realm of 100k cash, maybe more.

To war!

The Legacy Group did it better.

Wait, so let me get this straight, it's such a difficult concept to grasp. You're in an alliance together. You state that if someone attacks one of you, they attack all of you. So basically you're saying if you attack someone in your alliance, your alliance defends them? Blimey, what a novel idea.

Welcome to the party, and hello there Hereno.

No one's stopping you.

No, we recognize that we might be the only alliance going for a paperless route. So if alliance X is an alliance of 5 or less members but has a treaty with alliance Y which has above 5 members then we consider alliance X off limits for raiding.

Updating with our raid policy Any nation not in an alliance may be subject to raids from any Guardian member Any nation in an alliance of 5 or less members and hold no treaties to alliances greater than 5 members may be subject to raids from Guardian members Should any nation seek peace from raids, diplomacy may be employed but peace is not guaranteed. Reps will not be paid by Guardian members for damages caused by our raid unless it was in knowing violation of our guidelines. These are guidelines and should an event fall outside of such guidelines they will be handled on a case by case basis. Don't be afraid to talk to me if you're raided. I can be nice.

http://politicsandwar.com/alliance/id=625 Apparently CoIN (commonwealths of independent nations) has it listed we have a peace treaty with them. Several people have asked me about this now, so I figured a quick post would fix this confusion up. Guardian has no treaties with anyone at this time. We do not intend to hold treaties in the traditional sense in the future. My only guess as to what could have caused this mix-up (if it was an honest mistake and not an intentional fabrication) is that someone from one of our alliances raided someone in the other alliance and a peace agreement was made for that war. That's all I've got. So no, we're not allies with them, nor they with us. No we will not defend them based on treaty obligations if you attack them. Any further clarification required?

Nation Name: Olympia Nation Link: http://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=3767

So fresh, so clean.

"A heart of gold, but it lost its pride" Guardian has been around a long time. During that tenure we've stood for what we believed to be right and fought for such ideals we saw fit to fight for. Recently that reputation was tainted. I, the former leader of Guardian from years past, have stepped back into the leadership role to help right those wrongs. Memph, an equally great and if not greater tenured leader in this alliance, and Malone, a new face to Guardian but an equally experienced leader of other groups, shall be my seconds. We are not a triumvirate, though we may look like one. We are not a democracy, though we give all of our members a voice. This alliances is declaring its existence as a single leadership dictatorship. A few other points of interest. Guardian will not hold any treaties, we will have allies and enemies, but we don't find the need to list such things on paper. Friendships will be fluid, maintained through continued contact and interactions. The only exception will be if we offer an alliance a protectorate, so everyone knows they're protected by us. What Guardian considers to be an act of war against us: Espionage of having a member join our alliance with the intent to provide information on our alliance to an outside source. Espionage attempts in game which sabotage anything. Raiding our members, active, or temporarily inactive. Public threats of alliance military action against us by members of a government. Constant trolling of our alliance by an outside party. Of course such things will be attempted with diplomacy first the majority of the time. Note the list of what could result in a Guardian related war is not confined to this list alone. Our stance on raiding will be made announced publicly as well at a later date. http://guardianalliance.co/pw/ come visit us

Snowdust Imperium?

I've been a mod in several games. I've always found the games where moderation is done best is when your presence isn't detected. When people are talking about the moderators frequently, usually somethings wrong. There maybe a bias, too intrusive or public done moderation. What I've always found is if you dislike someone, and a possibly moderation situation arises with that person, pass it off to someone else to deal with if you think you might be bias.

It's only -1. If there wasn't P's in those spots then I wouldn't guess purple

P and if the first and fourth letter are P, then I guess the word Purple.