Jump to content

The Mad Titan

No Matching Nation
  • Posts

    907
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by The Mad Titan

  1. Make sure to use more than ships.
  2. Seems that we are liked enough to have the support to turn this war around, almost like OWF doesn't accurately portray where alliances stand.
  3. 1: Polar had stated several times we did not consider the war over, it is your gov that continued to ghost her despite being very active in other FA efforts that led to this. TEst was not in any way at peace with us and that had been made clear multiple times. 2: We wanted surrenders and guarantees that they would not immediately use their infra in the middle of a war time to start funding their allies. Given the character of those involved having a protector guarantee that alliances they protect abide by a peace agreement is not unreasonable. Negotiation is in bad faith when your leader ignores our representative for considerable lengths of time, and deemed it necessary to return to open combat. 3: T$ escalated this by aggressively attacking BK who was continuing hostilities in the current war. As for coalitions, T$ also called Sans and Typhon before BK called any allies of their own, indicating that you were escalating to full coalition warfare in aid of the enemy side.
  4. No one is debating T$’s right to choose to join the war in support of the enemy.
  5. To use NPO as a shield like they have for every other transgression this war.
  6. Lol effort bait. Y’all wish it was that dramatic.
  7. We’ve agreed that it If they admit they lost and will surrender we can discuss terms. It’s really not that hard.
  8. It’s ok in sure y’all will have a new narrative soon enough.
  9. I don’t think this will age well lmao.
  10. Compared to your plan of what? Sitting there with nothing? Your whole strategy relies on BK and NPO running out before you. Good luck lol.
  11. Were also making money that exceeds the upkeep.
  12. A global war happened 5 months into a 6 month NAP. So there is nothing wrong with it.
  13. They haven't earned terms. I am pretty sure none of you would be covered from each other?
  14. I mean it's not unconditional, just defeat must be admitted for talks to start.
  15. 1: We aren’t pushing for peace, we are ready to peace whenever your side is ready. It makes sense if you have to talk to opposing leaders and see their whining. So rather then have pointless arguments that go nowhere they will get a 24 hour period on the first of each month from which to engage in peace talks to avoid wasting time. 2: This whole concept is flawed. This is like having a dog attacking you and being concerned about heart disease in 30 years. Could NPO get 1000 nations and roll BK in two years? Probably. Have they started an aggressive war against us with punitive terms and refuse to surrender when it didn’t work? Nah.
  16. It’s not vague to point to the obvious collusion that happened there. Plus it was admitted the logs had been held for a while. You’re not fooling anyone.
  17. To start an aggressive war. Doubt you meant to lose it though.
  18. So salty NPO joined. Almost like they threw a wrench in your plans.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.