Jump to content

The Mad Titan

No Matching Nation
  • Posts

    907
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by The Mad Titan

  1. Considering your applicant list has almost 3 times as many people as your actual alliance I am sure you can fill your ranks.
  2. Clarke fighting forever also permanently crippled DEIC, reducing them to a secondary power status. I guess NPO wants to follow in those steps.
  3. The irony in you not having the reading comprehension to see "Amentia" is amazing.
  4. BK was responsible up till NPO refused reasonable peace offers. All destruction after the talks fell through because they were the only ones who didn't want peace is on them.
  5. Fair enough, I don't speak for other alliances (or my own for that matter), but I exspressing views I had gathered from those I have talked to.
  6. Pretty sure most of us don't. NPO=martyr hasn't won you any respect.
  7. Didn't you guys war them in June? Honestly thats super impressive to go from demanding all their oil to them wanting to merge with you. You should give your FA guy a raise.
  8. This is going to be a bad year for TFP.
  9. What dark times? We have not lost a war yet.
  10. May I ask how you came to this conclusion? I am honestly curious how you came to think it helps BK to pay NPO reps. Someone has to bite.
  11. We want compensation for being attacked by four alliances. Theres our justification.
  12. Your not counting missiles. They are already at zero revenue, but theoretically in a protracted war we can reduce NPO to zero infra and zero improvements. I know NPO was offered financing by SO, I am sure UPN would be offered the same.
  13. You missed the part where you invaded them without a CB and lost to that list of why they want you to pay reps.
  14. To be fair actual peace talks occur behind closed doors between govs. As you can tell from the Rose thread they have not been successful so far.
  15. Read the responses NPO has given and explain how they have been gracious losers.
  16. Again the point I am trying to make is not related to any specific punishment for losing, nor is it related to who was aggressor or defender. I was commenting on how NPO specifically put out an offer (despite being losers and having no leverage) they knew we would refuse, or we would have only accepted if we had no self respect. Not everyone needs to be on them, nor do I know what steps our allies would take for peace, NPO has reached a point where basically most of our members cant fight them, they are too low. However they can not rearm as any point gain will immediately result in 3 people jumping on them and beating them back down. Are you suggesting that eventually we will pay reps to NPO for peace? Also lets see support after 2 more months of zero growth and continuous bombing.
  17. Well someone will crack eventually. I doubt it will be us, so you can ask which of your allies it will be.
  18. Either way having NPO's allies be tied down puts pressure on them. NPO obviously doesn't care what we think, but maybe their allies hold some influence and can make them decide to quit. If not, well we can keep this up forever.
  19. By that I wasn't referring to the concept of white peace itself. I was talking about how the losers came back with a lowball offer of what we felt was fair. Similar to how TFP refused the flag despite Test thinking that was an acceptable punishment. Thats why TC is still in the war. Rather than keeping Alpha style situation we will bring everyone down. Worst case BK doesn't grow, but neither will TC or NPO. This means our allies are able to grow and next war only BK will be stunted on our side but a large majority of their side will be.
  20. Good faith implies you wanted to reach a reasonable agreement. White peace is not a reasonable agreement, nor would any self-respecting alliance take that offer after being attacked.
  21. I mean I am not gov so I am not privy to peace talks. From what I have gathered is NPO came in offered token reps, then left when we wouldn't let them off scott-free. Same stuff they spout here they actually believe, so force is how we have to bring them to the table.
  22. Till your leaders decide to give NPO members a break.
  23. wut m8 We are holding NPO accounting for attacking us. You hit us, we hit you back, now you pay for the broken nose you gave us in the first punch.
  24. It doesn't matter if it is "right" to take hostages or not. The reality is BK and friends has everyone down and NPO is the only one who can end it whether you think that is fair or not.
  25. The thing is they don't get peace without you, so you can explain why they burn for NPO while you refuse to surrender.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.