Insert Name Here

I agree with you but the impact shouldn't be this big, especially when you're just promoting long attrition wars where numbers alone are enough to overwhelm an efficient war effort from an outnumbered coalition. Those aren't healthy mechanics imo.

You can spare the semanitcs lesson m8, I know what a meatshield is. Now if you're done trying to spin it with this vague narrative, please be aware I know who put this all together, namely through years of optional (that then turned to paperless) treaties with alliances like TFP or WTF. All that + alliances Rose claimed to have parted with + good ol' treaty chess through indirect treaties has resulted in this kind of disgusting blob that, when it was on opposite sides of your alliance, they didn't seem to be okay with. Just be happy with the partly paperless blob your alliance managed to build and have a nice day.

We have way too many mechanics that reward quantity over quality. Like in Dial Up, where the vastly outnumbered coalition destroyed p much every military the blob had, but then they were able to hide in the shit tier and swarm the enemy just suiciding aircraft, and then they obviously had the numbers to pin the aforementioned targets.

Clarke's sister would be proud.

Yes, imagine joining the side being dogpiled instead of doing the dogpiling. Weird, I know...

I missed you.

He's a poor excuse of a troll, no need to waste time with him.

Ah, I miss the days where alliance govs gagged clueless members so their PR wouldn't be harmed. But for that I guess you need a competent alliance. Fun.

They're all to Rose what the rest of IQ was to NPO: meatshields, flaming garbage that can never serve another purpose than being a buffer for the main alliance.

Why are you trying to explain it to him? Reading comprehension obviously isn't his strong suit.

His tiny brain is incapable of processing stuff like this.

I applaud the creativity of saying "cry" in every post. Again, you're terrible at this but I have better things to do than waste my time with toddlers. Have a good one.

About alliance warfare, since apparently people some people are stupid, let me explain. Even before this new bunch joined the bandwagon, in terms of nations alone the ratio was already 2 to 1. In terms of tiering they got it more than covered as well. Especially taking into consideration all they have to do (which they have already with weakened nations) is suicide aircraft and spy slot us. This was actually more or less what NPO did, as even though only them and BK were competent in their blob, the numbers alone were too overwhelming. Sad it has come to this for Rose. Bunch of hypocrites. You're bad at this, son. Don't try so hard.

Go to bed kid, let the grown ups do the talking.

Wow such high level FA.

Honestly disbanding would get them more respect than this. This is officially IQ 2.0, but at least IQ's blob was based on paper treaties.

You are the most pathetic bunch I've ever seen. Pure garbage. Kudo's @Abbas Mehdiluv, you kept complaining about IQ and then throw every possible meatshield at us. 2 to 1 wasn't enough of an advantage?

It is indeed conjecture, and no, they won't comment because I know who pulled the strings in Rose that war, and probably still does.

They were planning the offensive blitz we were gonna launch that same day. However Quack only knew about HM wanting to hit them, so they preempted. The rest went on as planned, with everyone declaring on their allocated targets, the difference being that Rose bloc + Immortals and friends technically launched a counter, as the alliances they were supposed to preempt hit their coalition partners at the time (HM). EDIT: they also knew about TCW wanting to hit them ofc, but that was known from the leaks.

Yes, Rose bloc.

They had been done for days.

I fought vs Quack that war, and this is the great part of having no responsibilities in this game anymore: I can tell you there were coalition wide spreadsheets to blitz that same day.

Ugh, the FA level has gone to shit. I miss Partisan. Look mate, ther war on Quack was an offensive war (technically defensive but Quack was gonna get blitzed so they preempted) launched by a coalition of 3 different spheres. Comparing that, to jumping in for defending an alliance you're not tied to on paper, is borderline idiotic. There's nothing wrong with owning a treaty, but trying to take people for a ride is simply unnecessary. I'm privy with people who formed that paperless treaty so you can drop the BS okay. Thank you.

Damb, it's like talking to a wall, below is the war I'm talking about. Also no salt, I play this game more because of habit these days, to fight wars here and there and that's it. Check the link below for the aforementioned war and, by all means, keep making a fool of yourself. I cba with randos who don't even know about fairly recent wars. https://politicsandwar.fandom.com/wiki/Duck_Hunt Prior to this war Rose and Immortals already had a paperless treaty. You're welcome for the information. If you're gov of any alliance, you're not doing them any favors with whatever you're doing, which I wouldn't go that far as to call FA.

Dude, are you for real? You don't even know which war I'm talking about lmfao. You're confusing it with that sorry excuse of a global war that happened recently.