Tiberius

It's pretty entertaining to see you spout that we are selfish, when you refuse to relinquish your hordes of cash for peace and instead let your communities delete away. There is a reason you are economically in a better position in peace time to us, and that is because 1. Your longevity has put you in a position to have more cities and thus a better commerce base to rebuild/stock cash etc and 2. Because you constantly rolled everyone that was ever a threat to you in quick wars which meant you never really took much damage while the defeated alliances took twice as long to be able to rebuild and that is if you didnt hit them while rebuilding. You always made sure opposing alliances could never surpass you in political and economical power. Now the script is flipped and we are going to push to level the playing field. If you want peace then you have to accept your rebuild will be compromised. You wont be able to rebuild and restock as quickly as you are used to.

What threat to the game? Coalition A refuses to pay reps as peace terms. If they prefer to continue warring rather than achieve peace for their communities then they only have themselves to blame. You are fighting for alliances who would happily roll your sphere when the opportunity arises. Will it be worth it when this war concludes?

War is always fun. In victory and defeat. I appreciate it's not everyone's cup of tea, but it is half the name of the game. My guess is that the politics of your higher gov and their coalition leaders could end the war at any point but they choose not to pay reps. I'd urge you to petition your gov to do the right thing if you are struggling to keep your community together. There is no shame in that.

Good luck!

Good little skirmish! Good luck with the rebuild.

I'd hazard a guess and say "most of us" doesn't actually refer to the majority of us. If you were truly against bots you wouldn't be in Rose, since your own alliance uses them. What stick do you plan on beating us with once bots are outlawed and we are still better than you?

Just because you like to VM when faced with war doesn't mean others don't enjoy it. Being on the end of a beat down is really fun.

Pffft and after you degraded my comedy too.

Fortunately so. I shall claim this victory and wish you well for the future until our pens cross paths once more.

Legit points only come from Coalition B, nice try.

Nothing beats self reflection.

Scarfy, scarfy, scarfy. Learn not to bring your IC hatred into OOC discussions please. I am sure you are fully well capable of acting like an adult outside of the games politics. You can always DM me on discord if you have any issue with me OOC that you want to resolve. My suggestion was derived from the community wanting the following: - Mechanics that reward winning wars rather than the current status quo of not wanting to beige. - An option to be able to rebuild - Give everyone a fair chance to fight back when declared upon rather than logging in to find your airforce wiped out My suggestion covers all of those. As is normally the case with suggestions, they can then be built upon, modified etc

You surrendered from Coalition A under terms, those terms were breached and so the conflict continues putting you back where you were before terms were agreed, which was Coalition A.

Don't worry, we will switch the lights off on our way out. My comedy is as successful as you.

You do sound mad though, I don’t know whether to hand you toilet roll or a breath mint.

Just a raid bro. Why so mad?

They all went in because they were told it was an easy win.

I post with the intention of all my posts being bad. What's your excuse?

Lol at all of Coalition A wanting peace. Maybe next year bois.

We should allow unlimited automation for $10 per player per month. Alex gets rich, we get to go to the pub.

The reason I suggested safe mode as it is, is I think the beige mechanic forces wars to last much longer than they need to be, however it rewards activity and forces better co-ordination. If you are active you can slip into safe mode, if your opposition is slack on co-ordination you can slip into safe mode. The option to VM will also be still there. So you could conceivably VM and when you return hit safe mode. I've attempted to ensure wars will be won such as intended and given the opportunity for a mode where Nations can rebuild, as well as ensuring length of alliance wars are shortened.

Again I'm a member. If you are expecting a useful answer out of me, you'll be waiting a long time.

Yes. I gave my personal opinion that I wouldn't give KT a separate peace. Roq is saying that now KT has split from its treaties that it's potentially an option for them. Again I'm just a member, so if you want to take my comments seriously, please yourself.

The answer you seek can be found after that post I made if you elect to use your eyes to read. Alternatively you can gather a campaign together and prop me up as the new Emperor of NPO and then my words can be an official statement. Better the devil you know, than the one you don't

It's not for me to exclude alliances from the option. I am a mere member.