Blade

3 points... 1 - The money paid for the treasures is worth more to small alliances than the bonus income from the treasure. 2 - Collecting treasures requires a huge amount of political manoeuvring which is good for the game. 3 - If whoever your individual was feels he's unable to influence change by himself should find others who feel the same as himself and either organise conflict to bring about change or at least work together to collect treasures themselves and thus use the mechanic the way Admin claims he intended it to be used rather than just throw their hands up and start !@#$ing in private channels.

We had the same problem xD

Aye... that's what I remember it saying, but can't see it on the credits page?

Anyone worked out how to redeem it?

Or he had no standing army almost regardless of his build. Seems to remove any point in growing big though? As, paradoxically, I'm safer staying at a low score than I am moving to a higher score?

It would be nice if the upper and lower limits were the same so as people can support each other defensively if attack from below without having to dismantle large chunks of their nation. 175% to 57.142857etc% Currently I could open a can of ass-whoop on a guy with a score of 1750... if he wasn't prepared I could rip a big hole in him. His mate who's also of 1750 score would have to drop to 1333 to defend them. On the bright side I guess it does mean an alliance of untouchable super-tier type nations would be impossible.

No. I'm newish and I can already tell you that would be terrible. How to abuse: Build new city Sell 100 infra chunks from said city to friend on alliance market who sells it back to you. 100 cheap infra onto 100 expensive infra city.

I'm no raider, but penalising players that go for a high city count with low infra style vs high infra with small city count seems pointless... they're both equally valid play styles with their own advantages and disadvantages. Changing the system so you have to have to have ~900 infra in a city to fully utilise its air force is too high. Especailly when in war you are likely to end with only 1 or 2 of the military sub sets still functional, be that ships / soldiers / tanks / air and you're going to need to be able to use them.

Poke?

Aircraft can currently target: Infra Troops Tanks Aircraft Ships Money Of these, infra, troops, tanks, aircraft, and ships definitely make sense from a realism perspective. Money I'm not sure about, but there must be some reason why we're allowed to drop a bomb on a large pile of cash. Things we're not allowed to currently bomb: Missiles Nuclear weapons Spies I 100% get why we can't bomb spies, I mean seriously... how would you do that? It would be like trying to bomb ISIS... Being able to bomb nukes would be nice, even if you were only able to knock out 1 a day or had say only a 25% chance of hitting, but I understand that many nuclear capable players don't like the idea of their very expensive stockpiles (presumably buried far under ground) at any more risk than they already are. Bombing missiles, why can't we do this? Surely in a real war ICBM launch sites are determined quickly and open to strikes? Using a similar mechanic to ships in a harbour, tanks in a depo, aircraft in a hanger, or soldiers in a barracks? tl;dr please let us bomb enemy missiles

Nation Name: Blade Nation Link: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=26133

10/28 02:27 am You've received a $10,000 bonus for logging in today! Logging in every day consecutively earns you extra money, if you check on your nation tomorrow you'll earn $20,000! While your nation is less than 60 days old, you can earn up to $150,000 per day! 10/27 08:29 am You've received a $10,000 bonus for logging in today! Logging in every day consecutively earns you extra money, if you check on your nation tomorrow you'll earn $20,000! While your nation is less than 60 days old, you can earn up to $150,000 per day! OR does this mean in total you'll have earnt 20k rather than will earn 20k?