Sir Scarfalot

I seriously don't see what your problem is. If you want to put it on Youtube then you can do that with or without being the moderator of the debate. It's hardly unfair to ask that the moderation of the debate be neutral to both parties. You're the one making it hostile to yourself by insisting on unreasonable terms in your favor. These shenanigans are why people are 'hostile to you', you know. You had a shot at defending your actions, but now you're undermining your own arguments by being petty.

P&w lives on yet, welcome back ~

Congrats, and may your opponents' VDSes always fail

Welcome to orbis~~

Purr~

No u pirates good, NAP breakers bad

Not in game-mechanical terms, which is what OP is talking about.

Can so. One-nation alliances are totally a thing, I ran one myself for almost a year.

I need my dose of autism

Happy birthday~

Exactly, so brag about the current war, not last year's raids

Last. Year. Brag about the current war, surely you can?

Man, I thought you'd actually gotten a bank raid in more recently than last year, get new material 😕

I probably shouldn't have, but there's three main issues to discuss and a centralized post would get messy imo

Obviously this is the most complicated question of all. Should Camelot pay reps? Be rolled out of the game? Should TFP and Rose be rolled out of the game for breaching the NAP first? Should they pay reps? Should we just let Camelot’s actions slide and not give nor take anything from them? Personally I’d like to let Camelot’s reputation damage be enough as long as they pay back their existing debts but I’d be interested in more possibilities.