WISD0MTREE

No Hughes Amendment, NFA, GCA, 922r, stupid import laws? Sounds great, especially since I can use them on pedo slave owners!

No. I wouldn't call it a stretch, especially since it's happened before IRL many times. PaW already sort of has this, though. A percent of your pop will act as defending soldiers in ground battles. If you attack someone who has no ground forces, you'll still lose a few troops.

There was nothing wrong with having 244 spies. The kill formula just needed tweaking.

It may be different from wherever you're from, but that's common use where I'm from.

I must've missed that official statement somewhere.

So we can agree that I've never said it. It's just the usual salt found on both sides of any conflict.

This forum is known to get pretty savage at times. See:

Alright, let's use what you meant. For simplicity, let's assume PaW has been around for 4 years. If CN has been around for 50% time than PaW, 1.5*4=6. Therefore, it is safe to say that PaW has been around 4 of the 6 years CN has been around. 4 of 6 can be represented by the fraction 4/6. I stand by my statement that PaW has been around for a fraction of the time CN has.

valid cb

Wait, people actually use the light theme?

KT was doing that back in 2017 (Animal Control Crusade) before it was cool.

Where did I say that?

"Yeah, EoS is probably gonna declare war on you if you feel like it. Is Tuesday at 8 good?"

If you read my post, I said PaW was around for a fraction of the time, not the other way around. I don't know what this is, other than winning.

From the dictionary: no longer having interest, relevance, or significance - Seeing as how PaW has almost 6 times as many nations as CN despite PaW having been around for a fraction of the time, I would argue CN's relevance and significance is minimal, if existent. lacking in gaiety or animation - I haven't played CN, but from what I've heard, there is a severe lack of dynamic™ political action. A certain alliance has held the top spot for ages. Some have said the spheres there haven't changed in a long time, nor have the leaders or influential players been replaced. devoid of former occupants - Seems self explanatory since the population of CN has declined in recent years. While there are a few former occupants, the number has significantly dropped in recent years. Using linear approximation from random dates where I could find archives over the past 3 years, CN will have no players by Q1 of 2021. Would you feel better if we called it a dead game walking instead of a dead game? k

Still unfeasible as the 1 nuke per day limit is keeping anyone who starts now ~550 nukes behind, if I recall Fraggle's nuke count correctly, and cities get extremely expensive. If someone tried to catch up in infra, it would make more sense for Fraggle to forgo a few nukes fighting the person. The immense amount of infra damage, due to the high cost of the infra at the level required to even come close to competing, would greatly exceed the nuke's cost and score loss. CN has 2,853 nations in existence. PaW has 17,578 as of now. Congrats, you know one of the many definitions of the word "dead." How fricking obtuse can you be? CN is dead.

What if they prefer pads?

You forgot about Power and Attrition.

I mean, I joined the forum in January of 14 and you joined even earlier, so...

Leaked KT ally chat logs. Hopefully this doesn't allow IQ to gain the upper hand in the war.

IIRC, TJest wasn't included in the stats since they were hitting both sides and the tracker couldn't handle that.

I only voted on one thing ITT, which was a down-vote for this:

I feel like we've been down this Trail before.