Jump to content

Coolossus

Members
  • Posts

    161
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    3

Coolossus last won the day on December 10 2024

Coolossus had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Leader Name
    Coolossus
  • Nation Name
    Coolossus
  • Nation ID
    627586

Contact Methods

  • Discord Name: Coolossus

Recent Profile Visitors

10210 profile views

Coolossus's Achievements

Advanced Member

Advanced Member (4/8)

45

Reputation

  1. Hallo, ask your alliance for an audit -> cash & resources for a functional build then switch to nuclear power plant and buy uranium (fuel), Although should also try joining an established alliance possessing active government that can mentor you right since you seem new to me.
  2. Sadly, this is already the case as of now, micros/new alliances can barely scratch the surface against established alliances unless they merge successfully followed by established old known folks as their leadership. I personally think game requires more economic updates over war at this point to help new alliances to catch up, I have lost all the hope to ever see any significant recovery mechanics and raiding buffs for the losing side against dog-piles lol.
  3. This is already the case during wars sanctioned by alliances as a part of coordination unless the war has been decided in the 1st blitz and by war, I mean conflict involving killing/destroying enemy's military over profit, beige-loot. Also, huge-updecs are also prohibited when the opposing side hasn't been zeroed or be destroyed to the point, they are considered safe. Now, what you are suggesting is "to make this forced by game" to make it work I see balancing the rebuy time of military by minimizing it -1 day with every +5 city down-dec against the defender capped to 2 days (For ground units) and 3 days (For air and ships) (stackable) which should help the defenders who are competent and can coordinate to some extent of course if they are willing to fight while also adding an element of strategy for aggressors to choose carefully who to hit. This is too harsh and unnecessary especially that if they have sold the units already, they can be defeated easily, what's the need to not grant them beige in a losing war? Nope it doesn't, instead it makes fighting back even more punishable and waste of time which is already the case post 1st blitz for the losing side.
  4. I might be able to help you out with some themes if you got discord.
  5. Hallo, is there any legit way to get minecraft free for PC? Full version I mean without spending a single cent.
  6. I might be able to help you out if you DM me the issue with ss of course if you are on discord.
  7. Hallo, unable to decipher properly what you aimed at with the post, but I will try to help out; Diplomacy/Politiks does exist and has more say than warring actually lol just not easy or lucrative to get especially if you got clickbaited into joining any over-hyped alliance on the basis of Cities, the most basic thing for this is, you have to be known, old player and possess connections for that which is something no beginner focuses on but gets trapped into chasing C40 scam meta which only creates fodder for a bunch of alliances. That's the brief summary. Now, diplomacy trumps over warring in PnW, only problem is it happens in utmost OPSEC way and while most folks think their leaders are inactive or something, they are actually busy plotting, scheming actively. This is something that's the most real part of PnW, i.e FA lol. In-game wise political elements are cosmetic, yes for rp perspective. Sadly, you will have to try a different strategy game if you are looking for those elements in non-cosmetic form. I hope this helps. This is definitely not all, but I don't feel necessary going on further without attracting unwanted attention, if you wanna discuss more, you are most welkome in DM's.
  8. It's the proof enough why PnW urgently needs strict spam, multi catching QoL update both on forums & in-game.
  9. @Nanami Haruka I appreciate that someone is talking about this grave issue finally. Haruka sama, plz make a list of every known scammer, embezzler and tax-farmer in PnW and call them out too. I believe in you ❤️
  10. Hallo, I am totally fine with every update no matter how controversial if it helps in fighting back for the losing side under dog-pile meta during GW's without being harshly punished and limited by the typical FarmVille mechanics of the game. Though we need more balances w.r.t rebuy time, casualty rates, updec-buffs etc. Also, I would like to add that touching & pinning down whales should be a thing for supporting smaller alliances if harsh down-decs exist rather than nerfing the whales. Mechanics should support competency, activity over quantity tax-farming fodder gameplay. I also believe raiding should be buffed within immediate effect to build an incentive for maximum conflicts against idle bank sitting.
  11. lol, if you are in an alliance led by scums you will get embezzled even with low taxes. Though I wish there were rules against such but almost everyone does that in PnW under various ways, takes a trained eye to catch it.
  12. Yes, and that also thwarts raiders which is why 100% taxes is the ultimate meta with long NAP's.
  13. I hate to break it to you, but this is the Age of Farmville where long NAPs are the meta.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.