Arthur Wellington

If you break a carrot both sides will grow a new head Ability smility

The nation of my alliance mate tarroc looks like one carrot. I also never understood bone daddy @Tarroc does it have something to do with your panth(sy)eon past?

If what the OP says is true and one war side is taking advantage from a certain game mechanic, then changing this mid war would be a no go. Also, people are still trying to explain why many baseball games.are unrealistic. Please stop for obvious reasons. And too add: OP keeps running a perso al vendetta against those whom he owns money too. Just pay up and safe yourself time on the anti-crusade.

I enjoy the scores on both sides. A big easy win without events would be boring, I like the ups and down of the last couple of weeks, for example and espially the drama regarding the Traitor and his French BF. Sometimes a cringe, sometimes something just.

Yes please. And yeah, Im really bummed about that city grant! Which AA will get me my next, do you think?

You defended chroglel all the time. I personally have a problem with kdishhdi over not giving me a city grant when he was our econ dude and since then I dislike anyone defending him. So yeah, please hand me a digital tissue.

7. You have issues?

Youre full of it. Your definition of the word hack is whats making you create these posts. Lets do it again: 1. Gorgel missued bknet without authorization. 2. Garglel messed with BK multiple times out of spite dispite being a valued member 3. You have profited of the gorogles abuse 4. You made an agreement 5. You backed out of it 6. Bk will never leave you or dieidjhskf alone because of your lowsy actions. 7. Make more posts trying to blame other for your own mistakes Edit nr 8. A bunch of coal A people knew about geogles actions and still blamed leo. Bother them.

Even your friend says 'However I will state this again, I do not approve of what gorge did, nor will i defend him on the stealing of cash or kicking of members' You were an appriciated member of BK that betrayed the trust given. AFTER that bk want to perma zi you. Why betray the trust instead of just leaving?

George, why wanna hurt bk so much? The forcing people out of the game as you call it started after your month long plan to leave, after you took 9 or 10bn (and gave it to oathbreaker bjorn cryside). Bk was fun with you in it! You werent being harassed, ignored or a low member who didnt get any info. so why? Is it really because of the permazi over the theft?

Let me try to imitate a teenager from the year 2000: OH MY FREAKIN GOD!!! Lying? Really? Leo was a victem, BK was a victem. Gorge wronged us thrice (4 times if you count his refusal to send me a city grant back when he was not being a jerk). On top of that, alot of people in Coal A knew (!!!!!) this and started to victim blame. Many people should (and you most of all, after gorge) tell Leo how sorry you are for blaming him knowing what you knew. To sum up: OH MY FREAKIN GAWD!!!

Learn to read. Alex determined no strange IP adress been used. Not the same mister backoutofadealthenshoutreallyloud

I still think coal a dragged out the war initially. When I joined pnw, 150 days ago, the war was already over. Coal a kept fighting and dragging it out which caused people going inactive, into VM and delete their nations on BOTH sides. A more reserved attitude 150 days ago would have brought peace a lot quicker. Since my joining alot happend, mainly to keep coal A down. Altough both sides leadership could have been more easy on the others, the boring chorus on these forums stating that BK-NPO-coal B is killing the game has at a certain point started to believe itself. A 150 days ago coal a dragged out the war, I bet if log leaking was a thing back then we can find coal a leadership stating something like: hang in there, lets sit this out, lets see test their patience. And thats fine, its proven succesful for coal a so far. BKnet being exploited to drop BK members however is just an ugly thing that understandibly coal a has no problems with. But dont act like its normal.

The point is no actual hacking was done. Warped logic to conclude that Leo thus did it himself. As for falsly accusing someone, every item brought before moderation and being denied should then be punished, for example if you claim alex is a mean and evil moderator that prefer goons, evidence shows the opposite is true and the whiner/claimer ignores that, he should/could be banned 4fa. I dont agree to that but if alex wills it so, who am I to disagree?

1. Agreed 2. It actually is. Forfeiting any game is part of the game. It doesnt occur often but both sides used it. 3. You agreed to something then backed out. And garge took moneyz from me too. How should I pull my head out when you are clearly full of it? 4. If you think alex is such a loser, not knowing a bunch of stuff, being a dipshit moderator (then ignore his arguments), why stick around? 5. No hacks were detected, doesnt mean leo did it. Learn some logic.

?? nice post

1. Point in question remains that BK got hurt during a big war without it being a regular ingame event. People leaving over loosing, however lame it is, is still a ingame event. This was not. 2. Whatever BK and or Leo has done during this war, it was with regular ingame events. This was not. 3. Bjorn and Gorge are clearly full of BK hate, so hardly to be taken seriously. Discussion about BKnet is all good and well but does bot negate point 1 and 2. 4. Gorge might not have done this, but several actions over the last few weeks/months certainly bot speak for him. Thats up to alex.

Dang. Weird posters. Messing up an entire alliance with not normal means is ok? Did you became so effective at forum wars you started to believe your own bs? Doesnt even smell funny anymore? Whatever you think of BK and or Leo, too harsh on war dodgers, too hard on bank stealers, or whatever, this was clearly not a regular tactic.

Say youre sorry? An old alliance playing this game was hurt in a bad way, and you made a mistake. So apologize to BK and Leo? Just because you had dealings with george, made an agreement, broke that, and have to suffer consequenses doesnt mean all of BK is bad. Say youre sorry? Later you can take it back ?

So is that a yes?

Could someone explain what the war was about before the sort of surrender post? From august until that moment?

Does coal A actually think they are white knights and coal B are black knights? Coal B is evil?*

I have a suggestion (point 5) 1. War starts. Coal a wins. 2. War continues. Coal B wins. 3. After 3 or so months of attrition war, I got several messages calling me to leave BK, a half baked attempt of a surrender post was made. 4. The owf turned out as front 2. Alot of blaming over and forth between coal a and b. Coal A is still losing on all ingame fronts exept spies (see stats). 5. Coal A stopts the blame game (even making perhaps valid points). Some time after peace talks happen in a better atmosphere, away from the OWF. It might have taken some time but finally prefonteen & co discover that shouting and flaming against people you want to deal with does not really get them to see things your way. * making point by point posts really stays awesome * everything coal a pointed out might be right. Where did it bring us thus?

Showing disagree in itself doesnt contribute anything really. Sure its a nice sensation but no more then that. It isnt real communication rather a popularity contest. I do think it will lead to more walls of text

Then why agree in the first place? Your story is not something that happend just now. So now. 1. theft by receiving stolen money 2. Breaking an agreement How are some people still surprised this brings out a strong reaction?