I find that other geopolitical games similar to P&W are better in some ways. i thought about it and realized that the military options in P&W are so basic. We ought to add more to our military options. It's a simple idea to add more, but here it is:
Humvees:
Causes less damage to infrastructure than tanks
Destroys enemy tanks and humvees more efficiently than tanks
Costs less to make humvees than tanks
Replace 1 tank with 5 humvees
More defensive
Bombers:
Causes more damage to infrastructure than fighters (planes)
Does not destroy enemy bombers and fighters as efficiently as fighters
Costs more to make bomber than fighter
Replace 5 fighters with 1 bomber
More offensive
Submarines:
Causes less damage to infrastructure than ships
Destroys enemy ships and submarines more efficiently than ships
Costs less to make subs than ships
Replace 1 ship for 5 submarines
More defensive
I have yet to see more sick people, declaring war for a birthday, and causing damage worth 3 billion. Why can't there be peace in Orbis? Everyone's success depends on each other, not against. This motive is absolutely horrendous, and this move is absolutely horrific.
It's a simple idea, but involves adding additional military vehicles such as humvees, bombers, and submarines.
Humvees:
Causes less damage to infrastructure than tanks
Destroys enemy tanks and humvees more efficiently than tanks
Costs less to make humvees than tanks
Replace 1 tank with 5 humvees
More defensive
Bombers:
Causes more damage to infrastructure than fighters (planes)
Does not destroy enemy bombers and fighters as efficiently as fighters
Costs more to make bomber than fighter
Replace 5 fighters with 1 bomber
More offensive
Submarines:
Causes less damage to infrastructure than ships
Destroys enemy ships and submarines more efficiently than ships
Costs less to make subs than ships
Replace 1 ship for 5 submarines
More defensive