Jump to content

zigbigadorlou

Members
  • Posts

    752
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by zigbigadorlou

  1. I just checked with Village, and can confirm: 1. You get 5% of the steel/aluminum required to build your lost units 2. It does not refund their lost units. 3. It does not refund winning defensive battles.
  2. You missed the part of the scenario where you have to have enough of an advantage to win the battle as well. I don't get why its winning an offensive battle instead of just all battles. From testing it on the test server: I'm pretty sure its just your lost troops that are salvaged. And you get them if you get any victory. However testing it now, the numbers don't add up properly for either just lost troops or lost and destroyed troops as Pre intended.
  3. Where's the -No loot or infra damage happens That's my vote. No loot or infra damage unless you fully win the war.
  4. Alexio of the Ampersandii calls for justice!
  5. Who is "we"? I thought the planned implementation on the test server was that: 3. Expired wars end in beige for the defensive nation with no looting or infra damage. There's already text on the test server for this!
  6. So you want to buff TKR? If I'm reading your suggestion right (which I probably am not), this idea preferentially buffs the top 3 who have a ton of cities. Having a communal military preferentially benefits the small nations that share an alliance with many big ones. Especially when opponents are poorly tier matched, the one with out-of-range whales would have a distinct advantage over the micro and mid-tier alliances. Right?
  7. So the list would be: - Max 3 trades limitation (the merging thing already exists) - Metropolitan planning project (c21+ discount) -PWPedia rewrite - Allow commas and $ in number inputs - Baseball income cap and other changes - Fallout Shelter Project - Military Salvage Project - Nation deletion resource splitting - Ally trade indicator - Alliance embargoes - Updated treaty web - Merging alliance trades into global market
  8. CTOwned, Locutus, who cares? Its just stats. What are you, a stat-hugger?
  9. -We disbanded because of changeup 😡😡😡
  10. As living in your parent's basement is financially sound So also are the benefits to perma-protection
  11. I'm so glad back rooms went for my wonderful idea. I congratulate our wonderful clock allies on this bold and courageous move.
  12. Wow. 3 cities, a moon project, and now you even get to post their announcements. What does it take for an alliance to so want a merger that they'd grant all of that? Wizel, did you force an irl meetup with Canbec like your predecessors did?
  13. Like some of the others, idk what's going on and can't read. But you better stop messin' with ma boi Kaka. #istandwithkaka
  14. Does that mean I can sign a ToA with Aurora now? You gonna bring them into the ToA bloc?
  15. Victory in our time. I salute CoA for a war well won.
  16. A forthcoming project has been planned called Fallout Shelter: While this is a nice project, having it as an additional project may nerf nukes to the point of semi-irrelevance. I would like to suggest that the Fallout shelter is not buildable if a Vital Defense System (VDS) is also built. This allows a choice between low chance of blocking or a lower but guaranteed protection.
  17. Great! I can't wait to see who's nominated once gw24 happens.
  18. If you ever need to seek asylum from this clearly abusive relationship, The Monastery offers up to two weeks protection.
  19. Pardon for ultracrepidanizing for a moment, but Last I checked IA doesn't get a say. Besides, idk why you'd be mad your little guys get to form an alliance and go to a better color. You should take them to green. Green is always receptive. My name isn't on that treaty, and I'm a high gov in BR. But that's ok. I know my place as a worthless prot. Krampus reminds me I'm just a worthless prot every day Its vague for flexibility. On an unrelated note, you got any room on pink for some city 5's? All in all I think this thread really shows the true flaws in Hollyro$e. They come into clock and our's thread and just complain about people. Meanwhile, we FREE SPEECH ENJOYERS allow some REAL CHARACTERS like firwof and han solo express themselves without muzzling real political interaction. What do you have to say for yourself Hollyro$e?
  20. Its nice to see people actually putting sigs and acknowledging the people in agreement instead of oversimplifying entire megaspheres as lone actors. Curious what you know that I don't. Is this about the GATO leak?
  21. Oh great. I'm going to get pulled in via a chaining treaty to defend 🤢waffle house🤢
  22. I like this clock because it's a classic example of Hollywood repeating the same thing over and over again. (Zoomers out there, check out this movie, Groundhog Day. Its a classic)
  23. What global? I'm not protesting the NAP even though I should considering all parties signed a pact saying they wouldn't sign NAPs. Hidude is proxy warring me tho 😭
  24. u wot I'm all for conditional treaties, but the fact that you just signed a DOUBLE BLOC WIDE CONDITIONAL MDP really just goes to show 1. There are two people dictating bloc politics while the other disengaged leaders let them dictate their foreign policy 2. HW and Ro$e don't care about the rest of the game and just care about their 6-9 month wars 3. Both care more about their pixels than allowing anything interesting to take place.
  25. ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ GIVE LOGS ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.