Jump to content

morts1

Members
  • Posts

    53
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by morts1

  1. So everybody knows what's going on. here are the terms offered which was followed by two changes to the flag. If the message had stopped before the peace terms everything would have been sweet. I say let your members vote on whether the flag issue is acceptable to them just as I did in my alliance. I know there are TEst members that are wondering what the hell is going on here. From: Odin Date: 09/25/2016 Sunday 11:17 pm Grüße, Cromwell. I am speaking in the name of Terminus Est as a whole. Beginning tomorrow, we'll end our wars with GAs. If you don't want any more action after beige, we make you an offer: As it is tradition in TEst, we don't take or even want any kind of repearations. Instead, this time, we made again (you might have seen the one from GPA) a flag for you. Other then the GPA one, yours is kinda cool looking, so i hope you're not grumpy on us longterms We had our fun, and i'm sure you too. You did a good job holding your backbone high in warfare and on the forums. Congrats! Of course as long there is war, your mates are free to retaliate. Peaceterms: Here's the flag: http://i.imgur.com/IYPINAJ.png You'd need to hoist it for 1 month, and get it hoisted within 1 week after peace declaration. If you're ok with it, message me back, and then we'll make a proper forum announcement.
  2. I want to state our case clearly. We do not think TEst is inhabited by A-holes. I enjoyed getting to know my opponents and I am pretty sure it was the same for them. I know that was also the experience of others in our alliance. It seems only the worst of TEst post here (Sailor Jerry excepted) and I would like to see normal and friendly members of TEst post their opinions here
  3. You might have a quarter fewer but your points were double and the amount of members within your range amounted to about 15. The only reason we were no.8 was for the same reason as youu, Sh -- I mean Alex's increase in military points. Not true I have already addressed this earlier. We are not neutral. We are pacifist unless attacked and are well used to being attacked. Have you heard any of us complaining about you attacking us? Ask Arrgh, Mensa or TKR if we have ever complained. We are up for it. What rank we are doesn't bother us. We are not pixel huggers.
  4. Actually we would be happy to accept a peace offer but unlike others we want peace with honour, not dishonour. We are also setting an example to the rest of Orbis who are sitting back and letting TEst do what they like. Its easy to appear strong and talk big when it is three against one and you only select members with at least 14 cities. Join a small alliance and see how YOU get on.
  5. If you are looking for me, I've gone to play baseball while I wait.
  6. We will never surrender. We do not kowtow to bullies.
  7. Do you mean angry or off my rocker" Either way, the answer is no.
  8. I wasn't debating, just stating my opinion. I was talking about reading other people's debates, not being involved in them. And, yeah, the analogy wasn't great but I am sure everybody understood what I was trying to say. As to thinking quite highly of myself, you guys can be the judge.
  9. Just messing with you man. As I said Forget the rest, inane wasn't even what I was originally talking about. I love a bit of debate when people are debating just for the sake of it, but there others who pontificate, thinking they are infallible like the pope. In the Dark Ages they actually had 3 competing popes at one stage - P&W has a lot more.
  10. Only the first sentence was directed at your paperless comment. The second sentence was an observation on the forum as a whole. You decide for yourself which category you belong in, inane or to the point. Now greatkitteh has invaded the topic acknowledging her? contributions are shitposting. That's what i am talking about.
  11. Ogaden & Betulius being exceptions
  12. A generalisation that in no way represents TFP. The forum seems to be mainly inhabited by a bunch of blowhards enarmored of their own importance which is why I rarely venture here
  13. When I originally wrote up our alliance page asking for independent people who could work as a team I don't know exactly what I expected but my hopes have been far exceeded. I have an alliance full of members i am extremely proud of. I would rather lead them in 50th place and sticking to our principles than be no.1 having compromised those same principles.
  14. It will take a while to get rid of 255 ships. I'll do a lot more damage before they are gone.
  15. Decided not to respond to Ole. Didn't delete it properly.
  16. Too right! This war is a blast. For those who thinks ships are useless have a look at the damage mine are doing. Have a look at Faendal as well.
  17. Just to educate you guys, our title is what is called an oxymoron. Look it up. I want to make a retraction on something I said above about Arrgh probably being scared. There is no truth to it. There is no alliance less scared in Orbis and they have been both very good foes and very good friends. My apologies to them.
  18. Real pacifists don't last in this game. If it wasn't for all you guys destroying each other every few months we would still be down in the 20's We mightn't have treaties but we do have many friends including most of the best I mentioned above
  19. P.S. We are not neutral, we are pacifist except when attacked. There's a big difference.
  20. From: Cromwell Date: 09/22/2016 Thursday 2:11 am Its good to have different opponents. I'm used to Arrgh and Mensa and to fighting against the best, Tywin Lannister, Avruch, Wayne, Jacob Hanson. Buck Turgidson but I guess you guys will have to do for now. From: Tim Armstrong Date: 09/22/2016 Thursday 2:12 am Block Communications *mysterious whale noises* From: Cromwell Date: 09/22/2016 Thursday 2:16 am That's actually ships you can hear. From: Tim Armstrong Date: 09/22/2016 Thursday 2:34 am Block Communications Haha! I like you. From: Cromwell Date: 09/22/2016 Thursday 2:44 am Most of my opponents do. That's why Arrgh gave us free a mercenary pact back in January just cancelled because they probably got scared.
  21. The only option i can see is to embargo all alliances using nuclear weapons. To embargo individuals would be too time consuming. However, I think we may find that the culprits account for much of the trade in the game so careful thought is required. I'm not suggesting people do embargo at this stage - just throwing it out there for discussion.
  22. The sorry was just for air attack on ships. We were talking about planes being involved in navy against navy battles. I am still of the opinion that would add realism to navy battles. Of course there would have to be a minimum number of ships before you would be considered as having an aircraft carrier - say 25-50.
  23. I check out a lot of battles and have never seen in planes lost on either side in a naval battle Ah, we are getting somewhere. I think we need to recognise that we all have a bit of self interest here. LordRahl only has 7 ships, Karrde who suggests a good reason for my suggestion but wishes to retain the current system has none. Their alliance only has 51. I have 240 (and my alliance has 1808) so although 100 is a very reasonable figure for most I would expect a few more than that for myself and others in the alliance that have even more.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.