Jump to content

Aerys Targaryen

Members
  • Posts

    526
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Aerys Targaryen

  1. The fortify option that was recently added is not working. War page = Fortify page =
  2. Treating treasures as a limited resource which should be shared between nations in an alliance is a very good idea. As far as I can think of, it'll still lead to treasure transfer, from alliances with low <cities/nation> to alliances with high <cities/nation>. If treasure bonus is made inversely proportional to number of cities, then it might stop alliances buying treasures from one another and everything you said, would happen (in my opinion).
  3. This thread was posted just for fun, referendum (and anything mentioned there) didn't take place No one opposed us when we left TI, unlike what happened in Britain.
  4. OP is going to lead his own alliance, which is protected by us. He could've added a tldr to for clarity
  5. And now you are stuck with our rations
  6. Holidays are over in TI, now get back to work lol
  7. It's been a pleasure ! *Takes out a pen* Now show me your tits
  8. I had the same problem yesterday (now it's working fine for me though).
  9. You are trying desperately to enlighten me from the beginning lol. I already replied to your comments saying "Alpha got declared by 100 nations", that's pure non sense, if you are still going to keep saying that, you are just an idiot. Speaking of Chola, we declared around 17 wars with just 7 or 8 nations. The only advantage we had is, first strike. You are just typing "this game involves team effort", but do you really understand what team effort means? Take your NK nations for example, they had terrible team effort, some of them fought with conventional military, others fought with just nukes, you guys are completely dispersed in score range. If the purpose of NK or Alpha entering the war is to help and relieve their allies (so that they can build up their military back again), then you did a really bad job. If your objective is to just burn our infra, then, meh not bad. According to yoso's stats, (infra destroyed / infra lost) for NK is 1.26. Fark, Guardian, Mensa, CS they all did much better than you alliance. It's not a bad number though, but still not that great.
  10. Exactly. iirc, they did the same thing to two of our members. So Alpha nations are built to lose?
  11. Like it or not, we have two major spheres. Our treaty obligations call us to defend our allies and when our ally's safety depends on their ally, we jumped in. If this happens again, we will again do the same thing, we don't need to find an example from history book to say "it's a thing, dude". This is how politics has evolved in this game, we are simply responding to the existing scenario. Irrespective of you, I was already in contact with him. Anyway, we gathered intel from his nation and that's not his personal stockpile at all. He took it from your other members and from our perspective, it's not possible to confirm whether he really wanted to create his own alliance or just create a new alliance for the sake of hoarding your money, the way Loxy did (not to mention, Loxy is the one who sent everything to Frauche). I. Do. Not. Play. (That terrible game that is totally irrelevant and I shouldn&#39;t be bringing it up anyways)
  12. Yes we did declare war first, but all Alpha did is launch nukes one after another. Which means, winning side took a huge loss, even more than the defeated side and the reps that we asked were supposed to, somewhat level the losses. At the same time, we are aware of the fact that we were the aggressors, so we didn't really insist on getting the reps. More than just asking, what really matters is how things moved forward. But the fact that you are making a big deal out of it, looks like you want to score some PR points against our alliance.
  13. We asked 100-200m reps and we were not even pushing for it seriously. Once we learned Alpha is not willing to pay (which is totally expected), we didn't delay the peace process. You are really going to make a big deal out of it in every thread in AA section?
  14. So you are again ignoring my request for further clarification on your previous comment, anyways... I made the first comment in a lighthearted manner (Notice those smileys there?), you took it seriously and started talking about an old war. In the war that you are talking about, your own (then) ally, Viridian Entente declared war saying "For Steve !". The same reason, "For Steve !" was given in (That terrible game that is totally irrelevant and I shouldn&#39;t be bringing it up anyways) while your allies declared war on MI6 when The Syndicate was fighting with Alpha. Our allies didn't start a war for (That terrible game that is totally irrelevant and I shouldn&#39;t be bringing it up anyways) related reasons, most of us don't care about (That terrible game that is totally irrelevant and I shouldn&#39;t be bringing it up anyways). Ok, now you are talking about this war. You were defending your ally, we were defending our ally's ally. I never claimed you attacked a direct ally, but a friendly alliance and we responded with the help of other alliances. Regarding the reps, initially we asked for it simply because the damage done by your side is too high, but we didn't really push for it. You refused to pay and we were cool with it and moved on. NOTE: We initially asked for 100m to 200m, especially because some of your members kept boasting about Alpha's bank having billions, though it's evidently not true.
  15. Doesn't Cumulus bank provide loans with half interest rate if we repay the loan in first week?
  16. First of all, I don't see forums as a place where people argue back and forth, that's the reason I told him to send me a message. If you want to talk to us, just join discord/slack/send a PM. Second, there is absolutely no reason to be embarrassed about our decision to declare war on Rose/DEIC (in case of last war). You actively plotted against our allies (which includes Alpha's shit talk to others saying t$ paid to Arrgh to raid NPO) and so we declared war on your side considering our best interest. In this war, again NPO attacked alliances which are friendly to ours and we responded accordingly. While we are on the subject, Placentica, please explain your comment on the other post (which I pointed out but you just ignored and didn't reply) I rarely talk with people outside my alliance except a few familiar people, so I want a clarification on your claim.
  17. We attacked you for in-game reasons Placentica, that's it ! If you want further clarifications on why we declared war on you, feel free to send me a message.
  18. The reasons for NPO's first time was covered very well several times in the past, I'm not going to type a wall of text or copy paste someone else to argue with you, it's not worth it. YOU WILL GET ROLLED IN THE OTHER GAME TOO ! FOR STEVE !!
  19. Ban discord, use slack #slackaccountsmatter
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.