Crust

I've grown more and more inactive through the past months, it's a blend between life coming at me hard/fast and me not being as interested in this game anymore. It's time for me to hit it and quit it. Thanks you for those lovely people I've meet through these past years. !@#$ off to all the garbage cans on this site as well! I wish the best for the fun and loving friends who are staying in the game and I hope you reach out on discord, twitter or facebook if we've bonded or boned. It's gonna be weird not having a PNW account after 956 days... Cheerios!

Wait a minute, I just realized this thread is a rip-off of my thread you cheap !@#$ing bastards!!!

Love ya, fam <3.

Tho I hate to say it y'all are one of my favorite alliance and I'm gonna miss y'all. Thanks for the ride and all the terrible conflicts

Good to know your allies know where to have you, fascist lover.

Why wait, nerd?

CF is an outspoken communist AA, are we too small for you to hit too?

How did you know I was an action based anarchist? Words are for cowards, actions are for the revolution!

If you think it's wrong, do something about it. If you are right in that this is unfair and bad, do something. If the alliance knows they're getting hit because of how they are playing and conducting themselves, the simplest answer is to change that. It is possible to play without being an antisemitic, nazi loving POS. And for the last part, what the hell do you even mean? Are you being forced in to posting? You are suppose to only interject when you want, none of us (aside from Alex) is getting paid for this shit.

Except nazi rp and symbolism is against the games rules. But whatever, it's not like Alex has ever cared or done anything about it, so it's only rational that alliances take things in to their own hand.

I'm rolling my &#33;@#&#036;ing eyes over here. If you think communism is equally bad or that it's unfair that fascists get hit for being fascists, do something about it. Stop your fricking whining, do something or move on with your lives. Or are you all as spineless as you are daft?

Yes, I'm glad you finally understand Boony

Eh, I for one do not give a single shit about casus belli. It can be legitime or not who cares. War is war and war is fun. However, if you claim to have a legitime reason for war I don't really see much of a reason for why you'd mention some fancy schmancy reason or other and then not divulge the evidence you were basing it on. But each to their own. Can we please just all go back to waring in a month or two?

classy allegory...

I for one truly appreciate how IC iron guard is role playing, being utterly defeated at every corner of the world. Just like their role models I'm sure we'll soon see them dragged through a public street, to have their dead bodies on display for people to spit on.

Us dying by our own dumbass fire? Sounds pretty accurate

Wow piggo, I thought you liked us. &#33;@#&#036;ing quisling

How dare you speak to me, ya gross fashy

I and CF stand by Fark on this matter. Eat shit Iron Guard

Listen, the fact of the matter is that if the way a group of people are playing a game is so strong that it ruins the game then the game is broken. You can't put the responsibility of a game's defect on people playing the game well. If one play style is the only way to either get on top or enjoying the game and only a handful of people can play it, the constant losers are either doing something extremely wrong or the game is broken. Cause as far as I know none of the major players or alliances are cheating, so it's all within the structures of the game.

Not only is that unlikely, considering most top 30 alliances have some prior experiences with one another, be it from seeing how the act on discord/the forum or just how they've been behaving during wars or interacted with certain members of the Alliance. But it's also unlikely cause that type of rearrangement takes a lot of time and effort. It's a wide scale project that needs around a hundred different people (considering most alliances have more than just one leader) to get involved and each Alliance would have to persuade their members of the advantages of doing so. The amount of time and effort compared to the reward just ain't worth it. And it hinges on more than a majority of these alliances being willing to go along with this idea.

I'd be stoked if most alliances went paperless or went down to simply one or two treaties per AA. However, it's kinda illogical to think that the best idea is to simply pair up alliances based on size. We're all trying to maximize the most fun/dominance for ourselves in Orbis. Pairing yourself with a random alliance you may have little to no relationship with sounds like the absolute worst way of doing so. Nor does it open up for dynamic plays. If (real world) history has thought us anything, it will surely be that the world reacts in a similar fashion to how a nation or alliance acts. When one alliance gears itself up to have as many within its group, its enemies will do the same. As long as IQ keeps having a giant treaty cluster, so too will syndisphere find a need for it. The rational thing is to scale back, strengthen your unity within the few alliances you have and then use a bigger cluster's whale size to its disadvantage.

Yay, a bloc not filled with nazis. I officially like you, don't disappoint. <3 Also, fite me fraggel!!!

Get over it, schmuck. Also, can I have my allowance now??? pweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaase?

Oh... Well that's fair. I don't pay attention to alliances that are not charming friends. It takes away too much time from my "staring in to a mirror while flexing"-time