Jump to content

Caecus

Members
  • Posts

    1171
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Caecus

  1. "Have you seen how well he's been going with foreign relations." No question mark. Which makes me think this is a sarcastic rhetorical question with bad grammar. Is English your second language? If it is, you are not welcome in Trump's America.
  2. I've read one of your posts now, and it seems like you would be the type of person who has his head so far up his ass that you !@#$ up basic English grammar through constantly sucking the anal secretions through your ears and shamelessly regurgitating your bullshit out one of your filthy orifices for the public to see. I'm not surprised that you think I'm the one who is delusional: after all, if I spent my entire life believing the walls of my anal cavity were reality, I would be just as ignorant and !@#$ed up as you.
  3. That's what I !@#$ing thought.
  4. If only anything the president did was scripted...
  5. Oh, sorry. Autocorrect. Either that, or my computer is very smart. Ah huh. By allowing Hitler to annex the Sudetenland, contributing to Germany's industrial capabilities. But why stop there? Hitler remilitarized the Rhineland too. And aggressively annexed Austria. Let's not forget the launching of the Gaff Spee (which, by the way, really ticked off British naval command in the south Atlantic during the war). So many opportunities to stop Hitler, and yet the British "empire" stood idly by because... why? Oh right, they weren't properly equipped. Do you think real hegemonic empires worry about their militaries being "properly equipped?" Decline of the British empire, my friend. Why do you say Trump isn't a Russian puppet? He seems to divulge state secrets to the Russians at the earliest opportune moment. He brown noses the Russian autocrat despite the federation opposing American foreign interests everywhere. Not to mention the fact that his old campaign chairman is currently on trial for illegal foreign lobbying for Russian political interests. ...Is it because he's pro-wrestling again?
  6. I did Nazi that coming from you. Ah yes, everyone remembers Chamberlain's "peace in our time" moment before 150 million people died. Britain may not have started WWII, but she certainly didn't help stop it. Perhaps if Britain's Empire still commanded the same hegemonic influence it once had in it's glory days and used it with wise leadership and principle, 150 million people wouldn't have died. I honestly don't think Trump is a communist, I don't know why everyone thinks that Russia is still a communist country. It's more of a plutocratic nepotistic dictatorship held by whoever can troll and kill the most people in the most efficient way possible. I just think Trump is both too corrupt and stupid to realize that he's selling our country down the Volga.
  7. Idk wtf "Progressiveness" is. Enlighten me what you think "progressiveness" is. Because if "progressiveness" means liberal social policies (in the American sense), China is a proponent of it. Legalized abortion, gun control, etc. WWII, the famine of India, the post-imperialism tribal conflicts of Africa, the religious conflicts between Muslims of Pakistan and India, Falklands (though that's comparatively smaller), Iraq-Iran wars. I won't count WWI because you Brits just !@#$ed up then by giving mixed messages to the Germans and didn't show good leadership at a time when the world really needed it. Some historians would say Britain became useless after WWI, but almost all would definitely say September 1st, 1939 was when Britain became an over-glorified FOB. If Russian special forces in the Crimea and Russian influence campaigns against both the US and the former Soviet Republics are any indication of Putin's intent to restore the old Soviet empire at the slightest weakness and chance given to him by US and NATO is considered a conspiracy, yeah, I'd say that I'm pushing it like an American pharmacist pushing pink pills.
  8. Panem et circenses, eh Commodus? Boring is safe. People tend to forget that in long periods of peace and stability.
  9. Politics is suppose to be boring. When did politics become an entertainment sport?
  10. lol, wtf is Progressiveness? You mean everyone who voted for Clinton? lol. All empires fall. Ha. Like you know anything about empires and their fall. Name me a single great hegemonic empire that has fallen that didn't result in subsequent years (even centuries) of death and destruction unparalleled. Name me the fall of a single great hegemonic empire that didn't devolve into warlords and banditry. I don't think you really understand what you are wishing for. I imagined it all different. I imagined it would be a declining American economy due to the wealth gap that forces Americans to decide between prosperity or republicanism and a desperate generation would choose the former and start some crazy crusade that breaks the coalition system into a bipolar nuclear Cold-war shitstorm that I wouldn't see in my lifetime.
  11. That depends on if Trump fires Mueller or pardons them. If Trump does either of those things and the Republicans let it slide (which they will), you would be correct. In all honestly, that terrifies me. The Washington Post's headlines would not be an exaggeration then. Democracy would die, presumably with millions of others in what would likely be the end of the Pax Americana. Shortsightedness and stupidity would have brought down America, not an overwhelming foreign enemy (though Russia did help out).
  12. Obviously, the depths of my understanding in this area is far inferior to yours. It never even occurred to me someone would judge candidates based on how pro-wrestling they were.
  13. Oh shit boys, the Muellerman is coming, and he's going to plow the dump! Until Trump fires him... Who wants to make the bet that Trump is going to fire Mueller? Oh oh oh! And pardon Manafort and his cronies!
  14. If Hillary campaigned in spandex choke-holding a skinhead in a 20x20 roped enclosure, you would have voted for her, yes?
  15. I see now. Lol. This is making a lot more sense.
  16. Well, that goes to show unlike the Trump administration, Meuller's own team is competent and knows what they are doing. lool, then there isn't a debate here. Your opinion, entirely devoid of facts, is, by definition of lacking facts, "talking out your arse." The only person who thinks your opinion might be worth anything is yourself. Trump is incompetent, and seeing as how nobody has set forth a challenge to that notion, I'm going to call it and wait until someone who actually has an argument to come forth and present their case. You claim me to be an extremist, yet you can't provide any evidence to the contrary of my claim. If there is only evidence for one position, doesn't that make that position the truth? The fact that you think there is an X, Y, or Z position when there is only evidence for a X position means that the extremist is yourself: you don't share the same reality with anyone anymore. That's pretty damn extreme.
  17. http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/27/politics/first-charges-mueller-investigation/index.html Suck it. Ok, so you were talking out your ass. That makes sense as to why you would even post that nonsense in the first place if it's not a declarative statement. And yet you keep posting an opinion, entirely outside the realm of fact, in a debate. Do you see the problem there? Is Trump incompetent or not? And do you have supporting evidence for either? If not, this is not a debate. This is a one-sided argument where one presents facts grounded in reality, and the other presents a worthless opinion that (as you have been posting about for oh-so long) conveniently doesn't require you to be for or against a position.
  18. Oh! That's really nice. You guys actually have a program for low-income/homeless to get your fees waived. Still, I imagine most homeless people don't really have their original SS card or their original birth certificate in all those shopping carts. I also imagine that those circumstances would also apply to those people who don't file, simply because they earn too little, and thus don't have access to a verified 1099. Anywho, things are a little bit harder in Utah. https://dld.utah.gov/licensingid-cards/identification-card/ It also doesn't help that Utah only has like 3 DMVs scatter across some 70 miles apart. Trump's team is at the forefront of a federal investigation in which a grand jury was called. That means people are going to jail. You can try and squirm your way around my words, but you can't deny that this is a serious probe and major members of Trump's campaign team are on the chopping block. Again, my point is that there is more in the way of Trump colluding with Russia than your flimsy evidence for 3 million illegal votes. Do you know why even the Trump justice department hasn't opened up a federal investigation to go looking for 3 million illegal votes? BECAUSE THEY DON'T !@#$ing EXIST. "But it seems unlikely that people inside the Kremlin weren't involved." That's not evidence though, only speculation. You keep presenting your crackpot theories without a shred of evidence, and then taking it as the truth. In the same way, I can only speculate that Trump betrayed the US to Russia. The only difference is, I have a lot of reasons to believe that, starting with the fact that everyone close to Trump has been subpoenaed and half of them are standing in front of a grand jury. "How about this, you walk me through a scenario where 3 million non-citizens would cast a vote, and I'll tell you how that ridiculous idea fails every time." Go on. Walk me through it. And I'll tell you how !@#$ing wrong you are. Unless you already know that, in which case, I don't know why you keep making yourself look silly. Then by all means! Present your evidence that Trump is not incompetent. Again, we are back to square one, with you talking out your ass and with no evidence to suggest Trump knows what the !@#$ he's doing. If you can't present any evidence, you can't defend your claim and you lose the argument. Should I declare myself the victor of this debate, or will you actually back up all the diarrhea that flies out of your mouth with real, solid evidence?
  19. Paul manafort, Michael Flynn? You seriously need me to go find you a !@#$ing newspaper? And where the !@#$ is this Clinton and DNC colluding with Russians? I saw that the DNC/Clinton Campaign funded the dossier on Trump, but nothing on collusion with Russia. Unless you thought that was collusion with Russia. Need a car for a driver's license. Need to wait in line for 7 weeks to get a state ID, especially if you are in a red state where they don't give a !@#$. Need a stable address for that too. No, I'm pretty damn clear about how elections work in this country, you are the one in a foreign country who thinks he knows anything about ours. I still don't think you know anything about how elections work in this country. How about this, you walk me through a scenario where 3 million non-citizens would cast a vote, and I'll tell you how that ridiculous idea fails every time. There we go! Discussion closed. Trump is incompetent. That was an easy argument. You literally spent 10 posts talking out your ass and came to the same conclusion at the end of the day. It's funny, because, you know, I've been telling you this entire time you have no evidence and I was right.
  20. And yet Trump's involvement with Russia isn't? Any reason why you would think this? Any reason why we should discount pretty much his entire campaign staff going to jail for it? Any reason why we should ignore Donald Trump's own son's confession on national tv? But no! God forbid, Democrats think that requiring a form of ID (IDs that generally people under the poverty line don't have) at the ballot box means people are going to fabricate 3 million votes. That's called a double standard. Also, I don't think you know how voting works in America. Why the !@#$ are we talking about his supporters? Why do we even care? This is about competence. Competence isn't a partisan issue. Competence is pretty damn objective, the same way that reality is. The only reason why you would think competence is a partisan issue is because you don't see reality objectively. I also don't see any evidence suggesting Trump is the super genius you make him out to be.
  21. No, that's called a double standard. When people accuse Trump of betraying the US to Russia, you demand the most direct evidence that Trump himself was involved, despite at least 3 high-ranking campaign staff and white house advisers now going to jail for that and his son/son-in-law/favorite daughter admitting to it on national television, and then call those accusations some crackpot conspiracy theory "that would make Alex Jones blush." On the other hand, California is a mostly blue state. You believe Democrats are corrupt. Therefore, 3 million illegal votes were cast. That's called a double standard, and if you don't think that's a double standard, you have no !@#$ing idea what a double standard is. No shit! Really? What made you come to that conclusion? The fact that there isn't any !@#$ing evidence of him being competent? You keep speculating that Trump might be playing stupid, or is warming up for something ingenious that no one has ever thought of. The problem is, if he really is such a genius, why hasn't he done anything? Why did his repeal and replace of Obamacare fail? Why hasn't he passed any major legislation in the last 9 months? Why hasn't he staffed major departments with competent, not-corrupt people? Why has he had to fire pretty much his entire White House staff, half for treason, half for incompetence and corruption? There is so much more evidence to Trump's incompetence than there is room for speculating his secret genius.
  22. That's some Alex Jones shit there. I find your double standard of evidence to be bullshit. Do you have any proof, or do you just talk out of your ass a lot? I still don't see any evidence that Trump is competent. Are you still defending Trump as competent, or can we both agree that the position is indefensible and we all think he's a "!@#$ing moron." You keep dodging the question by posting a paragraph and hoping that I don't notice. I'm not impressed.
  23. "They?" Who is "They?" I seem to recall only Trump (a notorious lying sack of shit, even you admitted that) saying those votes were by illegal immigrants, with not a !@#$ing shred of evidence to back it up. Even if those votes didn't help Hillary win the election, you nonetheless have to admit, 3 million extra people thought Hillary was going to be a better president than Trump. Basic !@#$ing math. "I don't get into it" is a great euphemism for "I don't have a single shred of evidence to point out something so disconnected from reality it makes me look like a '!@#$ing moron.'" Here's my case: Trump hasn't passed anything. He's stumbling into a geopolitical crisis in Asia, attacking critical members of his own party that would help him with any legislative agenda, punts any major decision making to Congress (DACA, Iran, Who's his daddy, etc.), turns a tactical mistake in a foreign country into a week-long shitfest where he insults the widow of American soldiers. Notice that I didn't put an "and" anywhere along that list. That's because I could keep going for !@#$ing days, but I think that's well enough documentation to suggest Trump is incompetent. Your pathetic excuse is that Trump campaigns well. Sure, I'll admit that. I would argue that key decision-making was more on his advisers and that he had a lot of help from the MSM and Russia, but I'll admit he does an interesting bit at rallies. W/e. Campaigning is not the same as governing, otherwise Congress would have an approval rating much higher than its sad state now. Trump's only achievement is that he can do a good standup show. If you think that is competence, you must be unemployed. That would explain why you are so bitter about Europeans having jobs in the UK.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.