Stadius

another one?

Make George princess of TKR and KT

Why isn't Citrus leading Empy

F

Global wars ought to be like sex: quick and painful.

Fantastic guide, thank you for introducing me to PnW, i'll be sure to share this with all new players!

They've festered up like rats in a rat den https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/clubs/36-your-waifu-is-trash/

Wait TCE was back?

Hello i am new please teach thank you! how to use forum? Let me reiterate: I'm new to the current state of PnW, there's an overwhelming amt of information

#RejectTheWeebs

http://chng.it/rsCs9TL2 Make Orbis family-friendly again

http://chng.it/rsCs9TL2

Avatar: (Acceptable) Profile pictures: (Unacceptable)

KERCHTOG + Coalition B vs. Coalition W (Weebs) We need to purge the forums and the game of these damn weebs and restore orbis PnW to a safe family-friendly game @Alex join our cause

Why are there so many people with anime profile pictures? Isn't this a tad bit beyond the lines of obsession with 2d-drawn females? Is this a new psychological warfare tactic as part of the Dial-Up war? How do we stop it

SK > SK > SK

I did have that happen to me, tried to lowball someone by attacking with 100 troops lol I just think its not enough, like you could form a sub-or alternative group of troops (militias???), drafting purely out of pop, instead of passive defense.

Hello everyone (or at least to people who scroll the forums), there has been an element of this game that I feel has been long neglected. Population. Before you start rifting through your keypad, or click that back button, hear me out. There ought to be a means of tracking a nations population loss through war, and more importantly, have that population loss actually have an effect on the nation other than reduced income. For example, on the espionage menu, there’s an option to terrorize citizens, but that really doesn’t do much. I have -2.5k approval rating, and that doesn’t do anything to me. Population losses would ensure that people try and sanctify their citizens, and ensure that its not just a number that one disregards. Here are some propositions: A) Have population loss be part of war report, and nation view (much like casualties of soldiers and loss of planes etc) b) Pop. Loss as a factor of resistance The more folks you lose, the faster your resistance goes down. There are two ways of executing this. First is to add population loss as a buffer to resistance loss, or alternatively, you could use population loss to consistently lower resistance. Ex: Process 1) Your city is air striked, you lose 12 resistance, but because you’ve already lost half a million pop., that means 18 resistance is lost instead. Or Process 2) You’ve already lost 50k pop, hence, you lose 5-10 resistance / turn. C) Add options to target civilians to lower resistance Is it unethical? Yes Is it a war crime? No, we don’t have crimes in war because we don’t have laws in war. Ex: Airstrike dense population zones, nukes, have ground troops raid city centers, have ships D) (Disclaimer: this ones a bit of a stretch, but it’s been an itch) Have the ability to form militias out of pop. Not necessarily Soviet style conscription, but when you’re being rolled by two alliances with barely a margin over you, there should be a means to fight back. In order to reduce the abusive nature of this one, it should only be available in times of war, and when resistance is below a certain number (45). Feel free to share your input on this!

Only true Big Brained Individuals will get this

Imagine this, a purely libertarian state whereby we can ALL start our own pyramid schemes. We don’t need state or federal legislation or statute to tell me I can’t mix Sewer water with color dye, call it HealthyProtein Water, and sell it on the internet. A nation is only free if it is freed from the shackles of government tyranny.