PiratePaul

Watchu trynna say, nignog?

you are correcr in your statement that a name cannot be offensive, but what it implies and the actions of one who had the name make it offensive. So, the name is not bad; the implications are.

People seem to be arguing over why some names arent banned. The rule of Nazi related material not being allowed is definitely for the best. It is arguable as to wether or not names of other oppressive people or leaders/contributors of genocide should be allowed, but Nazism has caused nothing but bad feelings for everyone everytime it is used.

Been a while since I last visited. Might be around for a while this time.

sick burn bro.

But, guys.... the rule is no Nazism... not no controversial hiatoric figures.

Amsterdam

Granted, but you die anyway. I wish my dog would finally learn how to track blood.

I think that licenses for guns is a bad idea. You don't need a license to own a car, but you do to operate it. If that is what was being said, then I misinterprated it, but that would also be bad. If I had to get a license for every type of gun I own (like with different automobiles) I would need a lot of licenses, but each gun serves a purpose. My type of lifestyle should not be punishable just because someone else broke a law. (Note: I hunt for almost all of my meat and grow the majority of fruits and vegetables that are eaten in my house)

I can understand that being a concern, but if someone were to try to rob a store that you were in, would you rather him be the only one with a gun?

It doesn't really bother me. I have a concealed carry permit. I don't understand why it bothers you, so can you please explain?

Hogwarts! Kidding. Harrisburg

Granted, but then they stand back up. I wish I had the decency to ask for directions when I'm lost.

I gives the governing body the right to deny your license. Other than that, I would agree (other than fees).

Granted, but it escalates into in an intergalactic war because all Russians are actually aliens. I wish I had a bear.

Most of you that want to change gun ownership and availability want to add fines and licenses to them. That goes against the 'right to bear arms'. I think that all citizens (excluding mentally ill and violent criminals) should have the ability to purchase a fire arm. It seems like a logical thought due to the purpose of the 2nd amendment, which is to protect oneself from the government should the need arise. If you take everyone's weapons from them, then the government and military can do whatever they want because we can't fight back. I understand the idea of taking guns away, or limiting access to a more specific few. I understand why you think that taking a gun away from someone will stop them from commiting a violent crime. But you would be incorrect to think that. You cannot stop someone who is mentally ill from doing whatever it takes to make them feel better. Sometimes it is violence, and you can't stop that by taking away guns. I think we should limit access to guns by background checks and should teach people how to use a gun properly.

You didn't answer the question. All you did was give a damn reason to change.

Granted, but you fail the tests. (u so dum) I wish everyone in the world suddenly died.

Azkaban I wanna see who doesn't know that one..

I think guns should be allowed in more places. You may think that that is a bad idea because it makes it easier for a criminal to commit a crime, but when you are in a bank, and a man tries to rob it, and 5 other people pull out their guns, who do you think will win? Armed guards in schools are kinda ridiculous. There have only been a handful of shootings in schools, so armed guards seems like a waste of money. Pretty much all that you said went against your first statement. 'A few stipulations', dude, you pretty much made it where the government can take away the rights of some people to have guns. As a southener, I hunt. I had to go through a safety course so that I could hunt legally. If you want people to require lisences to own a gun (in most states you already have to have a lisence to carry it) then I am against you.

WOOH!!! FREEDOM AND EXPLOSION!

Granted, but it is constantly at war with the lesser alliances and you cannot grow. I wish I could travel through time.

Die of WW3? Is it a disease? I choose a revolt anyway. Just imagine all the recognition if it is succesful, and I already am enough of an !@#$ that it won't ruin my reputation if it fails. Would you rather be stuck in a post apocalyptic future or in a distopian underwater city? (I love the games i based this off of.)

Tunisia

SOMEONE VOTE GUNS. ITS SOMETHING I KNOW ABOUT.