Spooner

^wut

The solution is to not increase the cost of military-resources. It's either to add a resource-sink (expensive new project) or to add a mechanic to actually encourage war. We're facing a problem where we are producing more resources per city than we used to because median infra per city is increasing and wars are infrequent.

>The alliances still at war on both sides have fought well. Nothing about the conflict or its conclusion can or should be construed as humiliating or degrading in any way to the alliances of The Inquisition who are still fighting or to their memberships. IQ the type of boi who convince himself that another man hooking up with his girl was his idea the whole time

Lolol, bish what

This is just a shoddy implementation of the score system. "Tiers" are a bad idea. I could come up with a few ways of potentially addressing the issue, but I suspect Sheepy is uninterested in development for this game at present.

keks all around boys

I think Rahl's irritated because soldiers can get killed quickly, leaving you with 10k tanks and no way to use them. Protip: Don't recruit your daily soldier cap, leave it at -200 so you can recruit more in a pinch if you have to.

F

Yes, LPS -- us making fun of you is exactly like the Holocaust.

Same

size doesn't matter, honey.

Anyone have an updated version? Looks like this wasn't updated since 4/26

Btw -- if you publicly declared your affiliation to Dio on the forums and your alliance page, there's a chance MENSA would protect you.

The forums are !@#$ed. Anyways, consider yourself a protectorate of MENSA HQ.

As one of the people in MENSA who hit Vanguard -- we just wanted someone to raid, tbh.

MENSA HQ PLEDGES ITS PROTECTION OF THIS FLEDGLING MICRO

Message sent

Sheepy -- what are your plans (if any) to address this? The war system is nonfunctional. Remember when you were mad that Arrgh's 15-city nations were using low infra build to declare on 10-city nations? I'm a 19-city nation declaring on 8-city nations. This is broken. Our side is winning a war despite a ~3:1 member disadvantage. Broken downdeclare mechanics are one of the reasons why.

This forum's headline reads: "Reporting of bugs and exploits within the game." Let's talk about moving alliance banks to prevent beige-looting. Everyone does this. MENSA does it. Zodiac does it. Our sphere, their sphere. There's currently a mechanic to loot alliance banks when you win a war. Moving your alliance bank during a war to sidestep this mechanic is by definition an exploit. Sheepy - Either remove the alliance-looting mechanic, or make bank dodging against the rules. As it stands, it's a nuisance (and pretty dumb) to just offshore your alliance bank during a war, then move it back during peace. It defeats the purpose entirely. Also, this is not because my side's winning the war. By the time this is patched, the war will be over anyways so it doesn't matter.

3% monthly? Nvm, I see it's weekly in OP. Ignore me.

Anchors away!

kek

I have 19 cities and just declared on a nation with 8 cities. Jesus christ lol. https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=13316 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=55439

Just fyi, I'm 19 cities, and it will only cost me ~130M to rebuild completely after this war (from near zero). Perhaps your 200m minimum is too high.

From a PR perspective, you should have waited a week for this survey. >Hey, sorry shit broke again >btw, considering tinkering with credit prices