Jump to content

Rozalia

No Matching Nation
  • Posts

    4918
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    48

Everything posted by Rozalia

  1. And where did I claim I have no morals? Exactly. Don't make ridiculous claims you can't back up. Me not being concerned about Trump dick pics or whatever doesn't mean I don't have morals.
  2. No. The umbrella term is Fascist, not Nazis. Nazism is a specific form of fascism and easily identified. Try again. Bog standard Conservatives are reactionary in a lot of places. So if that is what it takes to be a Nazi then yeah, you're doing as he said. That so huh? So I guess by that same token we should kill off Communists like yourself (deny if you like, no one believes you) to protect the whole. Ah but wait... those progressives are pretty bad too, very racist and aggressive people always causing problems... I guess we should kill them too. It isn't hard to understand how it goes. People are generally fine with killing people who are actually doing as they believe (if said beliefs are aggressive), however those who merely believe and don't do anything? No, it's generally seen as distasteful. I know due to your progressive puritanical nature that you have to portray humanity as evil, but no, most people aren't twisted like yourself. Besides you're a hypocrite anyway. If we used the same Nazi logic of yours and targeted the Mohammedans you'd be on here sputtering some pathetic defence (Jihadists are doers, however the Conservatives belief the same nonsense, they simply do not act on it. Nazis who don't act on it you think should die, so logically the Conservative Mohammedans who don't act on it should die too).
  3. Nah mate. He is a dishonest person whose word is no good. He loses automatically to everybody.
  4. He is basically saying you're being Trump here and saying there are bad people on both sides. Something like that.
  5. While I did hear about it going well across the board, didn't expect the numbers to be quite that lopsided. Others fighting aren't included. NSR isn't listed for example.
  6. And the blacks in government are those natives are they? They were brought in from outside the area and so are as "native" to the land as the whites. Just because they're black doesn't mean they're native to all of Africa or whatever. It'd be like saying that Cape Verde belongs to blacks as they are the "natives" even though all those there were brought in by whites who actually lived there first.
  7. I am aware of these things. National Communism is far smarter than Internationalist Communism as it can actually have a chance at working. It all exists in a chain upward. Yourself at the bottom, then your family, friends, town/city, region, country. Country is well established and even then you get people such as yourself, and you think you're going to get Russians or whoever to care about Congolese? No. People are different and will conflict with each other based off their differences. If separate by states then this conflict can be civil, though yes it could mean invasions (though we live in different times today in the west). If both are together then you get race wars, you get conflict, division. The EU, supposed to be a stepping stone towards such a nightmare itself cannot manage even Europe as the north is radically different to the south... and you think you can include South America and Africa into that? You're dreaming. Your full power globalism would make a lot of very rich capitalists very happy. It'd mean death, rape, and general suffering for everyone else. Rebellions, riots, and wars would break out across the entire world quick enough. If that sort of anarchy is what you want then cool, be an anarchist, but lets not pretend such a world is going to be some utopia.
  8. What is the relevance in your statement. I told you that what the Soviet Union was is not what your Full Power Globalism brings.
  9. Except that isn't what you want anyway. Your Full Power Globalism is not what Russia went through, it's a horror show only seen in dystopian fiction.
  10. Translation: Nothing matters. Changes that have happened should be ignore, whites should forever be punished for slights however long ago... strange I don't see you taking the same stance with Muslims? Aren't we just for bombing the middle east to pieces? Don't they deserve that too for what they've done? And finally your globalism should be allowed to run rampart even though it would make the rest you want impossible. All you want to do in reality is break the bonds people have, divide them, making them easy pickings for heavily capitalistic companies. No. People are not rapists or whatever other guff you think. We have come a long way and you know this considering all these things you go on about as being why deaths such as in South Africa and Haiti are deserved aren't present today (outside Muslim areas anyway). Nationalism is a force of good that can be used negatively, big deal, you can say that about everything including your precious Communism or whatever you are. At it's core Nationalism brings people together while your guff tries to dissolve the bonds of people while replacing them with nothing, making them easy pickings of the companies. People need to be united by something, simple as that.
  11. Really? Really? Really? Absolutely ridiculous. I suppose it makes sense considering how often you guys like to call back to slavery or whatever. Nationalism today is not 1918 Nationalism nor 1945 or whatever else. Nationalism like many things can evolve, there are different versions, and can differ based on culture and other factors. You're trying to simplify something, pretend it's an old form, and then claiming it's all bad.
  12. Again, going back to WW1. We're talking Nationalism today, current year and all that, not from way back when.
  13. Hogwash. You simply cannot compare Nationalism today to Nationalism of the past. Hardcore Ethnic Nationalists still exist of course, but they're a minority in the west (widespread as you go east though yes).
  14. So... talking up Lenin and attacking those who came together for their nation's sake? Right. It might be hard to understand but you sometimes put aside your differences to tackle threats. Nationalism today is not the Nationalism of 1915 or 1945. Please get with the times please.
  15. Because like after WW2 the world moved to shift the current order to something else. Who said everything has to be rainbows? History is history, get over it and deal. Nationalism today is by and large very open, integrating people regardless of their race into the collective. As it should be, though as said, if the main ethnic base is not maintained then it can collapse on itself and fail. Race hustlers will take advantage and set people against each other, those people being part of the group you run with. You didn't address the fact that globalism is literally to blame for what you attack. You can't have this socialism, communism, or whatever you want in globalism. Globalism ultimately if unchained becomes capitalism unbound... and that is what you want apparently. You think people suffer now? Let globalism run free and see what happens then. Nationalism is a bond, one that can protect the people from many things (one of which is now globalism). You hate it because Nazis and KKK or something, which is silly.
  16. Incorrect. Nationalism was put under attack since WW2 and even for a time became a dirty word (people such as yourself still try). Nationalism in no way promotes having slave workers on the other side of the world as the current system as it takes away a nation's independence and takes jobs and money that could go to ordinary people (and instead goes to corps). Globalism (why mention capitalism as something for Nationalism when Globalism is way more capitalist?) is guilty for the things you describe and you want more of it. Ridiculous. Same lunacy as the Communists/Socialists being for free movement when it'll completely ruin/make impossible what they want in place.
  17. And who is to blame for that? The same globalism you're in favour of right there. Such a world will not manifest, but if it did, you'd quickly find just what it will mean. A lot of conflict and division. In addition the rich will prosper even more while the poor are moved about wherever they are needed like cattle. The fact your hatred of Nationalism goes so far that you'd support corporations like that is really telling. Explains why the genocide and Islam defenses too. Hate Nationalism so much that you will support and defend anyone, no matter how monstrous.
  18. Which claim? Me saying you're wrong? I highlight these things because they expose a certain group that you are part of. You're of the crowd that is holier than everyone else and yet so obviously act vile like this? People deserving what they get was said about the slaves too you know, the Jews, it goes on. How does it feel to be playing that game too? So yeah, sorry if I'm not all that moved on talk of morality by someone who has defended genociders and the like by saying they were justified (Haiti talk). Also, not Christian so stop that garbage with me please. Lucifer will illuminate the world! As for South Africa, like with Israel, they should deport/kill all the people they want gone and be done with it. That clear enough for you? South Africa is now what it is and they can do in their country what they like. If only more countries had the courage to take stands for themselves.
  19. Yes, I only hate suffering when they are white. Quite the claim. I know full well how the world works and have said the best course of action from them now is to in fact flee. I merely like to point out how a certain sort will get up in arms about the smallest thing regarding minorities being oppressed, yet when they're white they have no care at all. They "deserve it" in fact as you put it. You're naive if you think that things would have gone different if the whites had simply treated them better previously. Racial groups are powerful things with only nationalism able to break the tie in most cases, and even then it's not a huge number especially with how under attack Nationalism has been for decades. You need ethnic Nationalism to the point that the main group remains primarily of that ethnicity, as otherwise things will start falling apart and getting ugly. That does not mean of course you shouldn't have non ethnic citizens, however integration into the main group is required so they don't become divorced from the main group. In addition you're completely wrong from a start. Ethnic states have far less trouble of such a nature in them than non-Ethnic ones.
  20. You can say that if you wish but it will eventually be turned on you and people you actually care about. No good comes from this behaviour especially when the world is watching. The message in South Africa for example is quite a clear one for people in America and Europe. If you let your group lose control of the country then those that take over will exact bloody vengeance on you. The message of the far-right is proven completely accurate.
  21. So you're just a big liar who goes back on his word, and yet you attack the Roz? Right. Who cares? Jefferson was a rapist. A dick picture to you is beyond the pale though? Absolutely ridiculous.
  22. Even if it were the case, no one will care, actually scratch that as people will merely like him more. Trump is a rich billionaire who has loads of sex with hot women, everyone will surely be shocked by that development. Trump is already known to be incredibly "immoral" in such things so what is another brick on the wall? Stop breaking your word for such minor stuff. Next you'll tell us the revelation that Trump posts mean tweets.
  23. Lordship had been a free man for a long time, something he relished in as Lordship had always enjoyed far more the company of men. However sometimes you had to lay back and think of the radiance, and eventually he relented to his ministers' suggestion of taking a wife to strengthen his position. Only if she was deemed passable however. Minsters John Domino, Sojourner, Strife, Shlappa, and Radoje came to together in a committee to discuss possible brides. John Domino was the first to put forward a suggestion, "Brothers. Clarke's sister I've heard is both beautiful and would fulfil certain... conditions... that would please our mighty lord. Lets make for Acadia and get Lordship her hand". Entering the palace the minsters soon came upon who they thought was Clarke's sister, however when the shapely well dressed person turned around it happened to be Clarke himself. The minsters were taken aback, but it being John Domino's idea he mustered up courage and while ignoring Clarke being in a dress, asked for his sister. "My sister is a very busy women, what with her managing all the finance here in Acadia. However if you were to give her a treasure then she may well agree to this". John Domino smiled, "Clarke, our master Lordship owns much wealth and has untold amounts of treasure. Name it, and you shall have it". However when he heard that the wanted treasure was the statue of David, he was left distraught. That was one treasure Lordship certainly wouldn't do away with, and so the ministers had to turn back. Sojourner before they could leave however had a brilliant idea and rushed back to ask if Clarke could simply go dressed as he was, as his sister, filling her role as wife. Clarke covered his mouth as he giggled, "Oh? Fancy me do you? Well, I'd be fine with it... I guess.. but Lordship would have to pass the test. Is he tolerate of say... Effreu Arifluid Ambonec Angeligenders?" Sojourner tried to engage his brain with these words he had heard, but puzzled, he simply left. Strife was next and put forward Yui as a candidate. Their gender was unknown and surely that was good enough. However all the ministers were scared of Yui and so they did not inquire on it. Shlappa was up next and he tried to recall the last woman he saw... which took a good while as he suddenly noticed that the Radiant Castle sure is full of just men, however he then remembered when they had Queen M over. The other ministers were sceptical but they thought it worth a shot anyway. They met a very enraged Queen M, still angry at her mistreatment by Lordship previously over the !@#$-Cock incident. They were then assailed with insults, that they were idiots for coming to her, that even if it happened she'd break Lordship in two, that he couldn't handle none of THIS, so forth. As they listened Radoje could take no more and interjected loudly, earning a look of great fury from Queen M. Now intimidated Radoje spoke meekly, "My lady", "I AIN'T YOUR LADY" quickly interrupted Queen M with vigour. "Uh... well... I agree with you, we have been idiots. We have been speaking to men all this time when we should have been getting a ladies... I mean uh... well... well, we'd like your perspective. In your wisdom who do you think would be the best woman for master Lordship?" Queen M went silent for a moment before responding, "A woman from the east would do it. Someone like Lordship can't handle an ebon goddess like me, but those eastern women all look like young boys so they'd be up his street I'd imagine". The ministers pleased with a possible successful suggestion went back to the Radiant Castle in a rush. Quickly they learned what had been said, eastern women had a certain look that was deemed passable by Lordship. In the east the most important woman was Roquentin, however there were some concerns of her and the order she belonged to. They followed some strange religion called Communism which made no sense to any of the ministers, but no matter, all the necessary steps were taken to quickly get Lordship and Roquentin married. With her forces of the east joining together with Lordship's Radiant Empire, no one would surely be able to stop them. The Eastern army accompanied Roquentin on the trip and entered the Radiant Castle, they would merely stay a week in case things did not go well and their lady then required an escort back east. However while the opening days of the marriage went fine, the timid up to this point Roquentin suddenly morphed into quite the harpy and Lordship could not take it. He regretted his marriage and berated his ministers, saying that regardless of how a woman may look, a woman is still a woman. His suffering of his wife's words was short lived however as soon Lordship found himself imprisoned by Roquentin's eastern army who being inside Radiant Castle easily took it. Roquentin told Lordship that with their marriage the Radiant Empire had opened it's doors to Communism, and Communism is a religion of peace who will enlighten the world to it's peaceful ways... through force. Taking control of the Radiant Empire Roquentin ordered the immediate subjection of all enemies. Thalmor of the Knights Templar, the closest power who had thus far managed to avoid Lordship's wrath found his forces first to be put under attack. ComradeMilton, the former swamp liver, had somehow found himself a post in Black Knights and liked by Roquentin for his piousness towards Communism had been put in charge of that campaign. Armies from everywhere under Heaven mobilised to take on this new threat. The Roz as he travelled in his movable mansion to the now occupied Radiant Empire laughed at Lordship's plight. The Roz had 42 women in his mansion without a worry, and yet a single woman had done Lordship in. Sad! ================= tl;dr Stand Back.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.