Jump to content

Yosodog

Members
  • Posts

    927
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

Everything posted by Yosodog

  1. Whatever happens, I know I'm going to instinctively hit NPO. This new treaty web blows by the way. Good job everyone smh. I still love me some tS and TKR.
  2. lol I'm never switching back to black after a beige. Once you go black, you never go back... to black.
  3. I think your applicant API is wrong. Seems it's https://politicsandwar.com/api/applicants/AID oh god I'm in love with you. Is there any way to get damages on the war API?
  4. Taken directly from the in-game stats tracker. They're super inaccurate but that's out of my hands.
  5. I've ran war stats. Here they are. Please read all of the notes on the overview page before contacting me about something. The reason the paperless' numbers are much lower is because they've had quite a few leave their AA throughout the war so I did not do war stats for those nations. TKR's side is pretty accurate, though.
  6. "The reason the BK Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the BK Army practices it on a daily basis."
  7. lol what even is this shit about?
  8. FINE, for !@#$ sake. I'll bite. It's not like I was trying to get through the amazing sequel of Anal Whores so I'll keep it short. If I understand your question Keegoz, you're insinuating that because one of the reasons we dropped Obelisk is because of their treaty with Polaris means that we aren't trying to mend wounds with tC and NPO, right? Hopefully it is because I'll attempt to answer your question. In my expert opinion, BK and NPO have made decent strides towards mending our relationship. We'll never be best buddies or even friends at that, but I think our relationship has moved in a positive directing since the conclusion of the Silent War. NPO makes an effort to talk to us and throughout last war, Roq was on our forums continually keeping open communications with us and we respect that and I think it has had a positive effect. However, I cannot say the same for Polaris, or any other alliance you want to throw under this umbrella. Polaris has made absolutely no effort, in my opinion, to attempt to mend the wounds of our relationship. Of course, we haven't either, but uh... :thatisnotmyjob.gif: So it's quite clear that BK is willing to move forward with the relationships with all of those alliances and we are in fact moving forward with our relationship with NPO. Now, it came to quite a surprise that the Obelisk Government thought it would be a remotely good idea to sign a treaty with an alliance that attacked us just a few months ago without more than a day's notice. This just screams incompetence at its finest. Now, we don't expect Obelisk to ask for our approval, but we do however expect the courtesy of being asked our thoughts on the matter and not a "Hey, we're signing this tomorrow." Especially considering that Polaris is in the complete opposite sphere and was our enemy in the previous major war, I don't see how this didn't cross their mind a little more in advance. I'm going off on a tangent so let me bring it back to your original question, Keegoz. We are willing to make amends with our previous 'enemies' and we are currently working on it with NPO. However, Polaris hasn't shown any effort into doing so. We also want to make sure that we can always be there for our allies and that our allies can always be there for us. We learned some hard lessons from our treaty with UPN. We do not want ties to alliances in completely polar spheres from us. This treaty would've been a clear argument for paperless because it would cluster the !@#$ out of the treaty web. When Obelisk signed this treaty without any regard to us, it was clear the direction that Obelisk wanted to take. After Curu spoke to all parties involved and got a clear picture of the situation, we held an unofficial Government vote, and it was unanimous to drop Obelisk. We wish them the best in their future endeavors, but those endeavors will have to be without us. I personally find dropping the treaty now and making our intentions clear is better than just using Obelisk as a chess piece in any future conflicts. Hopefully I answered your question Keegoz. I can't say that if you have any future questions I won't just shitpost but you can give it a shot.
  9. Honestly, this thread only proves Oblivion's leadership's inexperience and extremely poor judgment. I have glad we severed ties. Have fun with Polaris and the tC sphere. You seem to fit in quite well.
  10. Why are some people trying to shit on BoC for honoring their treaties? More blood for the blood god, right? I don't get you people sometimes.
  11. But Jaguar, why are you so mad that allies are honoring their agreements? You just seem a tad angry that it's finally TEst getting rolled.
  12. Jaguar, listen buddy, you don't have to be angry. Just let your pixels go. You can only be a pixel hugger for so long.
  13. "'His' reason..'? How do I know Greatnate is a male? What if he identifies has a Delphigender or a Ungender? I demand this is changed to a more gender neutral word. It is good in the war timeline, but it displays 'his' on the notifications. I can't believe that in {{ \Carbon\Carbon::now()->year }} we still have to fight for something like this. Shame on you Alex for assuming Greatnate's gender.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.