GeorgeLong

(to be fair, this is the most action the game has seen in weeks)

Ahh I just love when my notifications pop up with a non-DOE, DOW, ROH, etc. and show the glories of the nano-world... Gotta say the whole "I am not a anti-gay, but I will not support gay" was a bit of a mind bender there tho lol

Well based on the citation from the absolute most credible source in Orbis, I believe that leads to a few questions to clarify your position on the micro nobility scale: 1. Have you declared war on another micro because your feelings got hurt at the expense of your members? 2. Have you forced your high gov to stay in VM so they will not get hit and when they leave immediately demand all documents and source code to their personal bot? 3. Have you been in the micro-sphere so much there is a multi-alliance coalition that has an entire server dedicated to spamming memes about you constantly at your expense?

So with the whole doxxing thing, I am a bit confused on that maybe someone (possibly @Alan) can clarify: If it is true and did happen, then why wasn't it reported? If it is true, did happen, and was reported, then why wasn't it acted upon? If it is true, did happen, was reported, and acted upon, then why is that still relevant to anyone here? Either way, if the people in question are not in the alliances hitting BS, then I don't think that their actions, however bad they may be, are really relevant here tbh. Like if anyone was directly involved, then that should be handled in tickets with admin not as a reply to a CB. Get it handled, get them gone, and move forward.

Turns out apparently we didn't exist before. We exist now I guess

Glad to see the return back to the OG Training Alliance! Definitely the better name. (I mean a bit biased personally with the name lol)

Yeah honestly this would help reduce so many issues on sending grants with EA/IA stuff to members. On the similar tone of improving the process of withdraws, it would be nice if it could also put in the nation/alliance ID too instead of just nation name or leader name, but Minesome's idea is way more pressing ofc with solving a pretty big issue

Okay in more productive conversation, since clearly the 115th largest alliance with 14 members is not a macro, what does everyone think qualifies how one goes from nano to micro to macro? Rank? Score? Longevity? Impact on the general community? I would assume a combination of them, but just curious as how everyone regards the importance of the different factors impacting grouping

Hey, well looks like you all got the game community to know who you are really quickly. Best of luck with growing your alliance. I know we here all know that it takes some real time and dedication to pull that off.

Whoever wrote this should get a raise. I have been thoroughly convinced by such a post. Hope Atlas is doing well!

Well I posted it, never said that I wrote it to be fair. I credit Empiur and Yzard as the primary authors

We left Yzard behind as the blue, big headed monster. He's still left behind there in the embassies

Well Kan makes me do all the major alliance forum posts now it seems like. Time to coup myself to make someone else do it.