Jump to content

Lysander

Members
  • Posts

    95
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Lysander

  1. Player of the Year: Thalmor

    Most Influential Player: Velyni Vas

    Most Likely to Succeed in 2024: Themonia

    Best Alliance Leader: Darth Ataxia

    Worst Alliance Leader: Llojsa (Pelasgian King)

    Best In-Character Poster: Doctor (DocScripts)

    Best Villain: Sketchy

    Nicest Player: Hurhy

    Most Controversial Player: Graybird

    Most Missed Player: Redarmy

    Best Nation Page: 

    Best Fighter: Dryad

    Best High Government Member: Samani

    Most Online/Likely to respond in 1 minute: Themonia

    Best War Criminal: Betta

    • Like 4
    • Upvote 1
  2. Funniest Event - Any of Thalmor’s Drunk Shows

    Biggest Controversy - Graybird

    Best Declaration of War (please link) - 

    Best Wall of Text (please link) - Thalmor’s Boutique Alliances Rant https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/topic/36545-boutique-alliances-and-the-problem-therein/

    Best Leak (please link) - Aurora’s removal from Midgard  https://discord.com/channels/446601982564892672/600041080406409284/1100193409899176056

     

    Best Meme (please link) - 

    Best Discord Server - Royal Orbis News

    Best Ad (please link) - 

    Best Community Contributor - Roberts

    Best New Player 2023 - Themonia

    Sexiest Voice - Thalmor

    • Like 3
  3. Alliance of the Year: Carthago

    Most Improved Alliance: The Fighting Pacifists

    Best New Merged Alliance: Legion of Dawn

    Best Rookie Alliance: The High Table

    Best Alliance for New Players: The Fighting Pacifists

    Most Likely to Succeed in 2024: Carthago

    Most Likely to be Rolled in 2024: Singularity

    Most Honorable Alliance: The Knights Radiant

    Best Fighting Alliance: Knights Templar

    Worst Fighting Alliance: United Purple Nations

    Best Alliance Growth: Eclipse

    Best Foreign Affairs Team: Knights Templar

    Best Foreign Affairs Move: KT’s M with Aurora prior to Holiday Slumber

    Worst Foreign Affairs Move: WELP’s 6 month NAP with ODOO

    Alliance with Best Propaganda: Knights Templar

    Most Missed Alliance: The Wei

    Best Alliance Flag (please link): 

    Best Holiday Flag (please link): 

    Biggest Alliance Decline in 2023: United Purple Nations

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
    • Upvote 1
  4. 7 minutes ago, The Titan said:

    What about your attempt to pry information about peace talks from pretty much every relevant ODOO leader?

    Or pressure about BS-GATO relations.

    Or whatever you did to tick off Sing?

     

    Clearly you need to decide what comes first - your alliance ? Or your news network?

    Peace talks were already leaked to me, and I already publicized the NAP term, before I reached out for comments and to discuss with some friends in ODOO.

    Bourbon-GATO I reached out specifically to try to get an answer on what had happened to clear up the vague situation that had a lot of speculation going on.
    Singularity appears to be mad they got leaked on and I posted it.

    Anything else?

    • Like 2
  5. 2 hours ago, Popat said:

    On 22 September 2023 , Lady Gaga of Black Skies declared war on our applicant who had went recently inactive.  Brotherhood Family sent 2 counters. Lady Gaga sent me a message saying that they are sorry for hitting our applicant. 
    image.png.cd4dd49de332ae91ccd2726cd3650a22.png

    Usually , such matters end after a counter but here is a different story. After this message , Black Skies sent an **invalid counter**  and we countered that invalid counters. They once again sent counters. Alan has no reputation and keeps involving his alliance in war due to simple minor incidents. His poor thinking of that we can make anyone surrender below our alliance score is wrong. An anonymous  source with no credibility has even sent the target sheet of the blitz on BroFam. At first , We thought the sheet was false. But given the tension between us , We think that BS does indeed plan to blitz us. Here is the target sheet. 
    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vGUIMt6C60cp52ed7mydqPTrnX6JmdJJ36MroYnY5NU/edit
    They were now escalating the conflict so our leader decided to reach them for peace and the response is below.
    Image
    Alan says the game wants them to wipe the floor with us but the same 'game' has wiped the floor with him in past and he also mentions the 'threats' we made on his alliance. Countering for our applicants is not called threatening. Alan says we threatened to do 'Political opposition' against him. Let's suppose we did political opposition of BS. Did we tarnished their image? Did we used swear words against them? Did we plan to blitz them? Did we leak thier high gov chats?  Since , we are now talking about leaking. Their 2ic , Palsada leaked the whole chat of Delta bloc and joined the enemy sides. In fact , political opposition was done against us in form of slanders and trolling.  Just look at the hypocrisy here. Whatever I said above is not related to the reason due to which the original skirmish started , the reason was an applicant raid. Alan has been continuously avoiding the topic and blocking all modes of communication with us.
    Image

    image.png.dc0a5ae3cfcb7a992257c34f7f39ed05.png

    We told him we were here for peace and then the embassy was closed.
    He has slandered us , made false accusations , planned to blitz us , countered legal counters and God knows what else they may be planning.

    We ignored the slanders. We ignored the illegal counters but we are not going to ignore a whole blitz sheet against us.
    Due to all this , Brotherhood Family recognizes hostilities with Black Skies and are ready to defend against their aggression.

    Your RoH would be much better if you had cut the “did we…? did we…?” and “look what their member did years ago in a now dead sphere”

    • Thanks 2
  6. 8 hours ago, Alan said:

    Seems like another way for alliances to manipulate the market, stronger alliances make more on stronger tariffs.

    This however does pull the Market Sharing feature into question. Instead of adding something like Tariffs why don't we buff Market sharing/alliance embargoes.

    You can set market sharing to say 0% and all other trades are at the 10% tariff rate. Just add to what's existing and make the current features better with more involvement/planning.

     

    8 hours ago, Zei-Sakura Alsainn said:

    Yeah, this definitely isn't gonna work that way.

    Basically every major alliance and sphere has their own active big name trade market players, who'd get screwed by this. 

    It also screws over the other normal less intense players, who overwhelmingly sell to buy offers. 

    The only thing I see this maybe achieving is getting spheres to use the alliance marketplace mechanic. Or even just individual alliances, really. Most are big enough to do that. 

     

    Hell, I used to run the Econ for a 100/100 AA. Fully Autarkic. The only interaction with the market was me selling excess. As much as 40 active members, as few as like 18. It doesn't take alot to become independent of the market in this game. 

     

    For that reason, especially the above paragraph, I'm not certain it'd even be used. There's not many types of resources in PW, so it's incredibly easy for a small group to be self sufficient. There's not much scarcity either, and this would mostly just inconvenience your average player and completely wreck your typical big trader. 

    I just... Don't see any point or real benefit? Other than, again, creating closed off sphere markers and enforcing it with this? Unless that's your objective, then... I don't really see what alliance leadership across the game gets from this. Other than their market oriented members who bring wealth to the AA being livid and possibly leaving, and everyone else being annoyed that something they barely interact with anyway got more tedious and negatively affects their income and growth.

    But then, everybody would do that, and it wouldn't really be much of a CB would it?

     

    It's a nice idea, I see what you're going for. I just don't think it's really going to work, at least not how you imagine, if it does anything at all. 

     

    Definitely understand the reasoning being put forth here. To Alan’s comment - in a way, encouraging use of the market-sharing feature of the game is part of what this is meant to do. If the public market ends up not being able to sell goods for an alliance, then selling internally (within the sphere) becomes a lot more useful. Also helps during wartime, when you probably don’t want your members buying from your direct opponents.

    To Zei - Given that many alliances are already independent, and only interact with the market on an alliance level to offload resources, them not using the market isn’t really all that relevant, since they already don’t use it? Plus, alliances often do resource trades/sales through bank-to-bank transfers, which wouldn’t end up being affected here, meaning they can still do the bulk sales if they can find a buyer.

    Offloading on to the market might be more difficult for them, sure, and yeah, it could definitely hurt certain traders. At the end of the day, though, a lot of traders actually make up the bulk of market volume, so the only thing an alliance does by tariff-ing a trader is make their members buy internally, which as you yourself pointed out, most alliances are already at the point of being market-independent.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.