Monti

I suggested in RON for the design/dev team to be more open. I threw a bunch of suggestions out about it but I believe that discussions should be open or at least get more prominent people on the team. Another Idea that we were talking about is before you guys start the discussion about changes/updates, Let the public know before hand so we can provide criticism or some knowledge about the subject.

If its more than 2 people, Its probably better for all of you to verify. But, If you only have 2 people only one person necessarily needs to verify.

You can verify at https://politicsandwar.com/account/verification/ This will allow you to prove that you aren't one person.

Haha... this is one of the weirder bugs I've seen in a while.

ron

stop it

Zevfer and I are moving it to PWpedia. While It can be used in the Fandom Wiki, The capabilities of that wiki software is limited in what I wanted to do. and Its way easier for players if Its directly on the site.

Knowledge Base (A knowledge base is a published collection of documentation that includes answers to frequently asked questions, how-to guides, and troubleshooting instructions): I feel like this would be very similar to P&Wpedia by helping new players and people who forget 😅. It would allow new players ask/search questions on P&W. The Knowledge base can be hosted off-site on some admin supervised site or directly on the site how PWpedia is set up. I came up with this suggestion because I was looking for some other features of my upcoming Hub for P&W. I quickly made a few demos and here are some images. This should allow selected players to make articles on P&W mechanics or connected things to teach newer players on the game. _______________________________ Help Desk (A help desk is a department or person that provides assistance and information usually for electronic or computer problems): I think this could be a good idea since the number of issues the game is experiencing. It will allow users to create tickets on the website itself. Alex/Staff can have a few people volunteer for credits or rewards to monitor the tickets and help the person out. (ticket opener) I think this will help players and Alex. If this doesn't get implemented, I will just do it by myself :serious: Edit: Both of these could be player ran and admin supervised. 👋

Congrats!

oh is the the education alliance? I'm surprised yall are still around

I might have misread.. Sorry 😅

Rush/Village said the map history thing doesn't interact with the war itself/map generation. But, I still don't know why its gotten worse since then.

Rush brought up a suggestion in RON about just reverting back to the older war system or reworking it. It just needs to be addressed by Alex.

I saw this guy __Joker__#0554 asking to be banned in P&W discord. He deleted some of his messages but his nation page has offensive language on it. https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=453411

I thought of something else. I think all alliances should start at a fixed cap on military and allow them to upgrade the cap. That would allow alliances out of top 10 to have a say in this. Example: Fixed Cap: 10m Soldiers - upgrade for random amount - Upgraded Cap: 20m Soldiers

Spanky's idea was kinda like this.. Heres a way to fix it i just thought of. Tighten the war ranges and give the ability to send expeditionary troops to an ally. They count towards the units you have fielded, so if I lent lets say pascal 5k tanks itd count it as me fielding those units towards my max military but pascal would pay rss upkeep for them. Snd have them in his nation. You can only send troops in a certain score range. Doing this would force more cooperation amongst allies. It would also force the big boys to do more proxy like wars by gifting countries units and such. There could be a cap on the units based on your own military. So if pascal is lets say c15 with max mmr he can only get maybe 5 cities of max mmr units from me. Doing this would allow 3rd parties to intervene more in wars by gifting nations units without directly participating in wars. It would be a good mechanic because then in wars where lets say the prots are left out they could donate troops to their struggle allies without directly going to war. Or if lets say clock wanted to donate rose troops they could to a degree to help turn the tide. Tis a random thought I had lmk what yall think (taken from Ron) It would be a good idea If its done right.

@Ducc Zucc did you stay on the attack page? or it just happened randomly..

I feel like 120-100 is a good range If you want to include offshores or other peripheral connected alliances.

#IStandWithNSFN

micro moment

Even If I never really interacted with Red. "RedArmy" would always come up as the friendliest players both in servers and the yearly awards. I can tell by the reaction that people have, that everyone enjoyed the time that they had with Red. I almost broke down after seeing he donated his organs too. He will be missed. No matter what our "Characters" are and how we portray them. At the end of the day, we are still human.I don't know how much value I have in this universe, but I do know that I've made a few people happier than they would have been without me, and as long as I know that, I'm as rich as I ever need to be. - Redarmy (Quote from His Nation Page)

I was like why would you grave-dig this topic but it was a bot

If after 42 hours you don't have the credits. You'll need to take it up with Alex or this forum post I paid mine with PayPal and It was instant.

this aged well