[(ROH) At least this time we're not fighting solo]

Love the smell of napalm in the morning,,, good luck to y'all 

[Public Nuke list]

Yay im finally being nuked ❤️ thanks crunch this means a lot to me:)

[The Last Goodbye]

You were one of the coolest people I knew in Orbis, good luck on the rest of your travels. 

[AA]

I think he was being ironic because of the ban lmao

 

[Commodities]

21 hours ago, Seb said:

this would be largely beneficial to whales with an already inflated income. You add the chance to add 10% extra commerce and you will see some nations making 5 to 10m more than they did before. 1% benefit is enough to make a difference without destroying the base game.

okay that is fair, but many people did say 1% meant nothing. Perhaps 5% - 10% is to large, but maybe like 2% (being able to increase to 4%) or something like that

[Commodities]

Not that anyone cares, but the way I would change this system is everyone gets one commodity, that they can trade with other nations whenever they want. Bump them all up by a lot (like instead of a 1% commerce rate increase, make it a 5% or something, and do that to all of them). Then, get rid of the less expensive project, and make the more expensive project increase the rate of the commodity (so using the commerce rate example, it takes it from 5% to 10% or something like that) [By the way, these are just ball park numbers,

I'm just saying overall increase the impact of a commodity]. Obviously we would have to change what commodities are out there, but this has a couple of benefits to the game. Firstly, this will actually have an impact on the game. Secondly, it will allow nations to better choose what kind of nation they are. (i.e. whale, raider, balanced, etc.) this gives them the ability to double down on what kind of nation they are, or moderate what kind of nation they are. Thirdly, it increases the amount of interaction that nations have with each other, as nations would have to find nations to trade with (with more details than your regular trade interaction). Lastly, this is going to help alliances choose what kind of alliance they are. For example, aargh and mythic might want all players to have the raiding commodity, but other alliances might want to split up their alliance by commodity to better benefit the game. This also leads to more nations choosing for themselves what role they have in an alliance. Those are my two cents on it . 

[none of the above statements reflect the beliefs of my alliance nor are they endorsed by my alliance, government, or members. They are simply what I think would benefit the game]

[Moderation to Reduce the "Hate Breeding Pool"]

I also agree, I also don't think that this will be used for petty reasons or get a bunch of people banned. I don't think "edgy jokes" or anything will go away, but like potentially triggering topics like r*pe and su*cide (like explicit mentions where it can hurt someone) will go away. Same thing with like racism and sexism. 

[Reflecting on GW16 - Almost One Month Old]

The global has been fun, I feel like our alliance has grown closer too. Kinda related, but Alanfall made our alliance SUPER tight knit and I met some people on the other side which was fun

 

[[DoW] It's tea time]

gosh darn perfect time to increase my infra levels lol. Good luck (or bad luck idk, a moderate amount of moderate luck to all)