Rin

Holy shit on bombardment. But idk it's preferable to improvements disappearing when there isn't the infra to maintain them. I like it, but that's because of my sadistic personality and not because it's good for the game or anything. This is going to make dogpiles so much more OP and it's yet another raiding nerf.

That's me. The confusion was kind of a running gag 😛

Yeah, it was dumb and imo you deserved the ban. But we'll miss you 💛 May we cross paths in some other game.

I mean like if you build nations up and then they join an alliance on the opposite side, that's bad econ too. I guess I think of it as being good at investing.

So I like awards, in that they give recognition to people who were overlooked. I wish it was something like the Oscars, where most of the winners were things nobody ever heard of. At worst, it's like the Grammys, where the awards just recognize meh songs with the most playtime. Most of the time, the pnw awards ends up just a propaganda campaign. I wish it was a popularity contest. But this year has been much better than the past years, closer to the Grammys. Democracy is reallly not a good way to do this, because most people are just not paying attention most of the time. The average person looks at those sexy ads and flags and don't even know who made them. They'll know stuff within their alliance, and stuff the alliance talks about, but not much more. Open nominations are great because they bring up stuff everyone overlooks. Especially if it's like obscure, like best propaganda post. I don't really see the point if the best nominations are getting filtered out, but I doubt they'd win in a democracy anyway. So like I think the best way to get quality, Oscar-style awards is for a small panel to do it. Maybe even the same panel who brought you these awards. Votes here are kinda rushed, like everyone thinks for 10 seconds who should win, and then votes. And so you'll end up with like t$ winning best econ. When a small panel might have like 5 min to think about it, and discuss things like who got the most growth, or does banking and retention better, or little things like raid efficiency. Like when someone wins an award, it should be clear why they did.

I saw the image in question, which I won't link for obvious reasons, but I'll assume the people in question have shared it or it's still on the nation. A reverse image search will turn up a story related to a Nigerian murder. The details of the body are quite graphic, and on first sight, I assumed it was real. However, a discussion with some other friends unrelated to accused brought up that it was "obviously fake", given that a headless body should have either blood on the clothes or be in a pool of blood. I think this one is a little too close to call, but I would say that real or not, it was an honest mistake by the accused, who could mistake it as "obviously fake", and not be doing it out of malice. There appears to be no rule against morbid themes either.

How does Best Fighter not actually have the ones with the best stats?

Alliance of the Year: The Commonwealth Most Powerful Alliance: Grumpy Old Bastards Most Improved Alliance: Black Knights Best Rookie Alliance (must be an alliance formed in 2020): Error 404 Most Missed Alliance: GOONS Best Alliance for New Players: Rose Most Honorable Alliance: The Fighting Pacifists Most Immoral Alliance: The Coal Mines Most Controversial Alliance: New Pacific Order Biggest Warmongers: micro pockyclypse Biggest Pixel-Huggers: Spanish Armada Best Alliance Growth: Error 404 Biggest Alliance Decline: GPWC Most Likely to Succeed in 2021: Knights Templar Most Likely to be Rolled in 2021: UPN Best Economics Department: Error 404 Best Foreign Affairs Department: Black Knights Best Internal Affairs Department: Rose Best Milcom Department: Oblivion Best Government Line-Up: BK Best Bloc (can be a bloc that disbanded this year): Swamp (the one with TI and TFP)

Player of the Year: Borg Most Influential Player: Borg Most Likely to Succeed in 2021: Isjaki Best Alliance Leader: Valk Worst Alliance Leader: Leo Best Government Member (not a leader): Vexz Best General Member: Adrienne Most Missed Player: Buorhann Poster You Most Love to Hate: Cooper Best Villain: Dryad Largest E-Peen: hidude Best Fighter: hidude Best Raider: Dryad Most Controversial Player: Roquentin Player You’re Pretty Sure will be Playing in 2050: Callisto Player that is Worst at Responding to DMs: Inst Best Player Avatar: Partisan Best Nation Theme: Shifty Best Nation Page Design: Epi

Best Alliance Theme: Morningstar Best Alliance Page: Morningstar Best Alliance Discord: Rose Most Engaged Alliance: Error 404 Best Art Designer: Mars Best Moderator (can be either forums or discord): Dr Rush Best Community Contributor: Borg (seriously all the locutus prots and servers) Best New Addition to the Community: Yang Funniest Player: Shifty S. Stranger Nicest Player: Tyrion Best OOC Poster: Minesome Best Leak: Sphinx Biggest Controversy: GPWC Biggest Meme: burritos Funniest Event: all the people joining the game for manhwa

Someone do one for damage dealt by alliances

I don't think resource balances should be done around wars. War is already the hardest part to balance, and a small tweak ripples all over Orbis. Use other sinks. Economic is the best for this - projects, improvements. The UP/AUP project is genius because it balances between food prices and cash prices. Heck, if there's too much aluminium, raise the price of space programs over planes.

There were a few Trotskys. Idk if you were the one with the nation named China or the one from LSF. But welcome back!

Can confirm, the imaginary epi-peen was delicious.

I think the moon landing should remain as a pure prestige project. I wouldn't be opposed to other space projects being useful though, or even dependent on Moon Landing.

I like the idea. It would make spy ops more useful too. If you see that someone has 800 munitions, you could target that. It's not clear if you mean ground attacks or beige, but it would add another dimension to GA too.

What about just letting the players set their own list of default war reasons? Alliances and certain nation themes are gonna have their own standard battle cries.

soldiers go brrrrrrr But seriously, it's a fun war. Shout-out to anyone on the same side coordinating, and everyone on the opposite side who's being a good sport. And all the people who had to deal with the trolling but didn't stoop to that level.

There's inflation. 5 years ago, c14 was upper tier and credit prices were like $5m each. MLP and Iron Dome were the in projects, and nukes were too expensive to be practical. It was said that there was no point going above c20 or like 1800 infra because the ROI was too slow. Nuke project back then were about as rare as ACP today, but in this war I just impulse purchased it because the money was just lying around. I think it's easier and more fun to just inflate the economy more and make everything relatively cheaper.

I use a script for this. I don't see why it shouldn't be done in game. Worst case you'll get prices 30 seconds late.

Either the guy had two subways (bug) or the nuked destroyed the same improvement twice. Timeline: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=800158# City: https://politicsandwar.com/city/id=349434 Message: You detonated a nuclear weapon upon the nation of Ca-Na-Da led by aron. The attack destroyed 1,854.00 infrastructure in the city of charalston, and killed approximately 185,159 people, you monster! You also destroyed subway and subway.

Could I get a Dr Rush, please?

Some more details I forgot to post: 9 MAPs happened when I pressed back after the attack. When I went to get the timeline link, it went to 8 MAPs.

https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=800379 I did an air attack with 12 MAP. Still have 9 left. I think the big might be that it's collecting unused MAPs but not displaying it past 12.