Jump to content

Diocletian

VIP
  • Posts

    327
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Diocletian

  1. 7 hours ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:

    Wait so TCM was paying people to leave the worst color in the game to move to colors with a better bonus?  And then they went to war over it because the other alliances wouldnt leave?  I will never understand micros.  But I guess you make your own fun.

    Someone has to fight over the  second place first place loser spot. What better a hill to die on than Aqua?

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    • Upvote 1
  2. 12 hours ago, Tomislav Milanovic said:

    I would strongly recommend reviving your alliance palsada, lesson learnt, you were in a toxic relationship not long ago before seperating and forming your own alliance, than you merged with Black Skies and got stuck into another toxic relationship back to back, it is the same concept as coming out of a relationship and going on your own to focus on yourself, instead of jumping from one bed into another bed, perhaps you should reconsider reviving your alliance and continue where you left of, focus on yourself and your members, grow your members, go on your own for a little, if later on you decide to merge with another alliance, make sure you and your members are 100% sure or else you might end up back to square one. Anyways all the best for you and all PRIU former members.

    You even get an achievement for doing so. It's win-win either way! 

  3. On 11/13/2023 at 3:12 PM, George Clooney said:

    "Hostile Engagement" so you're getting married but you're both really sh*tty to each other about it?

    There's this new word, 'war' that would be a better choice.

    Once upon a time that was called a "love-hate relationship." I suppose on pnw nowadays it really means "I'm an edgelord ha ha look at me." 

    2014 was a long, long time ago.

  4. Literally the only gripe I have with the revamped war system is how stupid unpredictable the RNG has gotten. There's zero reason you get a 40 some to 100+ death/kill rate (planes) and the very real possibility of a pyrrhic victory. Aside from that, though, I think most of your suggestions would make this game even more boring. Alex doesn't want a boring and disengaged community, nor do I.

  5. 2 hours ago, Paralaxus said:

    This is a great idea, I'm looking forward to the diversity between economic and military strategy. It will be interesting to see how nations pursue different perks, how that affects alliance strategies, and beyond. 

    Also to the people complaining about nukes and missiles, keep in mind that both of those units are essentially useless when fighting a war to win. There isn't much more strategy to it. By making them selectively more destructive we are opening a new avenue of warfare, one that may deserve withholding MAPs for, rather than merely conducting an airstrike, etc. It may allow for a nation to recover in the same war, ultimately making it a skill/perk issue. This can help alleviate the "down-declare" gang-bangs during global wars.

    Tl;dr: I hoard nukes and missiles for fun.

    Tl;dr: Everyone direct sustained spy ops at this weirdo ;)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.