Jump to content

Gideon

Members
  • Posts

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Gideon

  1. 12 hours ago, KindaEpicMoah said:

    Also also Military Expansion should require at least twice as many kills. I've seen the logic behind the current numbers, and at that point you may as well give everyone between city 20 and city 30 a free city because of how little work it takes to get those numbers. 

     

     

    I think that's kind of the point, another catch up mechanic, think of it as you will.

  2. 36 minutes ago, CoraMcstrap said:

    They are doing an honourable thing. Do you need a dictionary to explain the meaning of the word. 

    Look i would have respected that move somewhat if they did this before 3/4ths of orbis declared on us, you know when Midgard was losing.

    Seems to me like they are desperate for a W and want to join on a global on the winning side, even desperate enough to ally UPN.

    • Upvote 2
  3. 1 hour ago, Mayor said:

    Fair war for TKR or HoF or GGO: Mostly even, maybe whale advantage, for sure blitz advantage, militarization advantage, cooperative allies

    Fair war for Aurora or tS or Eclipse: Complete dogpile, severe nation advantage in every tier, blitz advantage, secret treaty advantage, militarization advantage, economic advantage, make sure to have good ROI, guaranteed victory, majority of top 20 alliances on side...

    Yeah so many chance to turn this around, I think Cata probably should not have intervened but pretending this is a fair war with many chances at victory for both sides is laughable.

    cover7.jpg

    • Haha 1
  4. I don't dislike the idea and I wouldn't get mad or smth if it was implemented, it's just that i don't think this would really improve the game much gameplay wise. I think this would just mean that people now have a bigger rebuy (assuming the amount of troops that can be bought has a cap), but not really change anything or introduce smth new. Alex only has limited resources and and I would rather see Alex use those to implement mechanics that are new and make the game more engaging, like his UN concept for example.

  5. 2 hours ago, Borg said:

    There are already bodies of nations, which are alliances. Since nations are controlled by individuals, I think would make more sense to have the international body comprised of alliances instead.
     

    I dislike the idea of making this an alliance thing, most politics are already controlled by around 3% of the players if even that, i would rather prefer if the UN would be a way for all nations to participate a little. Alliances could still encourage members to vote in their respective alliances interests.

    • Like 2
    • Upvote 1
  6. 3 hours ago, Elijah Mikaelson said:

    Alex knows and seen the screenshots, thanks for quoting me. if you could now up vote that would be great. (Also cheater? i broke the rules but did i cheat? I do not think so)

    screen-shot-2018-11-27-at-4.25.50-pm.png

     

    • Like 1
    • Haha 3
    • Upvote 2
  7. On 7/24/2016 at 10:50 PM, Sodium Cyanide said:

    Buddhism is most likely viewed as "The religion of peace", But I'm not an expert on religion. But even then, Buddhism has branches just like Islam does, and many have pointed out Buddhism could be atheistic, "the historical Buddha taught that believing in gods was not useful for those seeking to realize enlightenment." As well as Buddhism lacking a god itself.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohingya_genocide

    Buddhism also has it's "darker side" which is not often recognized in the west because Buddhism has kinda become the go to spirituality thing for hippie white people.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.