Leaderboard

< 01001000 recei–... 01101001 00100000 01101100 01111001 01110011 01100001 01101110 01100100 01100101 …transmiss- 01110010 00100000 01101100 01101111 01101100 01101111 01101100 …translation success… > We’re rolling House Sta- < 01110111 01100101 error... 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 …transmission fail- 01101011 00100000 01100001 01110101 01110010 01101111 01110010 01100001 retrying… > < success > A year ago, Paradise and Cataclysm merged together to form Singularity. Coming off the back of almost deteriorated relationships, a herculean task was performed by all government members, past and present, to glue this alliance together into what it is now. Orbis was skeptical, but our people, the members of all walks, are beyond exemplary with their persistence, loyalty, and reliability. < 01010011 01101000 01101111 apply… 01100011 01101011 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01101000 01101111 01110010 01110010 01101111 01110010 00100000 01101111 01101110 00100000 01110111 01100001 01101100 01101100 00100000 01110011 01110100 01110010 01100101 01100101 …member… 01110100 00100001 00100000 01001101 01101111 01110010 01100101 00100000 01101110 01100101 01110111 01110011 00100000 01100001 01100110 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01100010 01110010 01100101 commendati- 01100001 01101011 > SIN commends all its members for the successive difficult wars fought. Born into fire, forged into a blade. 134 days spent at war since formation, as early as two weeks from formation date. Here’s to 365 more.

Since 11:11 PM server time. I compiled a list of the number of cities in the Alliance Rose. On the Alliance page I noticed that the number of cities total displayed was 6,800. However, I manually counted the cities of Members (Not Applicants or VM nations) and then Members (With VM and Not Applicants), the results I received were not the ones displayed instead were 6775 and 6986 respectively. I believe that the city total display calculations are wrong, (or something is wrong with GraphQLApi) as I have attempted it across multiple days using both formula's and manually counting receiving the wrong result many times. Can I ask anyone else who graphs City count to check if they receive similar issues?

We still won't change our color - Bellanostra

Learn to read smh

What are GATO's thoughts on this? Look at the size of Singularity and look at the size of Bellanostra. Compared to Singularity' you guys are just like a buzzing fly in somebody's ears. But you guys do make for some great entertainment to watch.

3000 days

Agora has been on beige so long that you cannot be considered apart of yellow any more.

Bro is a professional hater and honestly I support it

shut up weeb!

Here's to another year of We Are !@#$ Aurora, Christmas "Parties" and Fun times!

your members reading that

Don't worry bro we are changing it for you. Beige is prime real estate.

Ignore these folks. It looks like you used the Google Play Store, which is a legitimate way to purchase Credits, and they do cost more on there than via PayPal in the web version of the game because of the associated much higher fees Google charges. I am going to send you an in-game message, but this is a semi-frequent issue (not sure what causes it to only sometimes happen) and we can manually issue your Credit. In the future, for a faster response, please open a ticket in Discord via the #support channel

It just straight tells you to go to hell now.

I get the point you’re making, but you can also point to the fact that Grumpy hasn’t adjusted or adapted to anything to counter other AAs working on a counter for them. Their growth stagnated (Which is fairly normal for anybody over c40), their recruitment is abysmally low, and their political game left them vulnerable. The mechanics is one thing, but part of the game design is to work with other AAs or build your AA up to achieve whatever goals you set out for. Just so happened that Grumpy had rivals that wanted to topple them and they didn’t shift or act on it soon enough.

is this a DoW, or a RoH? :panik:

See, that’s with already established players. Majority of new players don’t have nukes/missiles yet. Those aren’t my concern. Raiders, strangely enough, aren’t my concern either. As for certain AAs, some of them just suck at organizing military and want to choose the easy way out (They even do nuke/missiles wrong too in a war lol). Most of those players could fight conventionally. Hell, most of them did for the longest time. You’re also not wrong about numbers. Majority of the time, you will get overwhelmed. Unless you’re very active and are able to land counters as the hits come. I’ll stop there though since your problem is much different than mine and I don’t want to derail it any further. I’ll be starting a new thread about my particular issue(s) later.

Enjoy your participation trophy I guess.

It's so over TKR bros...

@Alex To repay all donations made, you blatantly, you slander me with lies to try justifying your ban over an AMV & other lies. I don’t like people who take my money, then slander & ban me for no good reason. I want all money I’ve donated refunded or an apology for slandering me; along with all bans/strikes removed. If you do neither I’ll never forgive you & rip off reports /bad reviews posted everywhere I can think of whenever I have nothing better to do is likely. I can be vengeful & spiteful towards those who wrong me with no remorse or correction. Can also be very forgiving if it’s warranted. Your choice, although making up complete lies to try justifying the ban over an AMV was very stupid. Guessing you’re an Atheist with no morals, although most entrepreneurs don’t screw their customers if they don’t want a lot of negative publicity. So your choice if you want to make amends or motivate me to warn others not to waste time/money on this. Banning will just be taken as you’d rather create a cycle of animosity between us rather than fix things. You can make that choice if that’s what you want. Although I know I’m in the right, thus there will be no chance of forgiveness after that. Warning people not to play your game and waste time on it would become a moral obligation then to avoid others experiencing the same. So either pay back what I donated or take back your slander against me; as you remove my warns/bans. Shame its come to this, thought you were somewhat reasonable at first; although at some point something changed. Should at least be honest rather than slander people regarding the reasons for your extreme moderation action for minor offenses; like posting an AMV. We do not forget or forgive scammers who slander without making any amends. Your choice how you’d like things to proceed from here. I will not do anything illegal to hurt your business, but will pursue legal ways to get even if you really want beef between us with your slander and lies. You’re either a crook or you fix your mistakes.

This sounds like a violation of the Terms of Service to me, and a permanent ban for threatening staff. You also used inappropriate words in in-game messages, reaching 3 strikes which is an in-game ban as well. I don't know what you expected to happen by threatening me, but I don't negotiate with terrorists.

You guys declared new wars as recently as like day before Charles told me you guys hadn't declared in a while and implied you guys won't if we don't declare more. Until Charles said that you guys were resitant to that very kind of peace. However for now there aren't any new wars & just Singularity we're fighting. Also very impressive of Singularity to take on 2 alliances much smaller for this and already their hands are full. One of them appearing to be tied up in war when they did & still wars active when they did. All my slots were occupied. lol (See them trying to peace out everyone else active they attacked after 2 alliances fought back.) Guessing they didn't like the Opposing Tyrants part of our new promo image. lol, might feel it applies to them. XD

Untrue, Rose is the aggressor, any war declared on Rose will need to be on a nation, that's just how it works, Arrgh is fighting in its defence. If you disagree with your alliance's actions you should take it up with them or consider leaving to a better alliance. As for "loser", I think being loser would look more like hiding behind 200 nations for protection and whining on forums when you get hit anyway, or complaining about only the part of war mechanics that don't favour you. but whatever I would prefer not to use forums for petty arguments. so DM me or use Arrgh server for further complains, this thread is for a different purpose.

You chose the worst possible person to throw that argument at, I am possibly the only C50 who hasn't used any alliance help to get there, maybe apart from the UP Immortals gave me at c11, which I offered to pay back but they refused out of respect for my milcom services there not sure what to make of the rest of the post, you seem to have a shallow understanding of sociology but you're using it too generously. This arrogance is exactly why I love doing this, you think you should be invincible because you are in Rose but I disagree. So by all means keep whining while you get burned to the ground. Or take the whining to your gov because they're more responsible for this than us. but congrats on missing the whole point of the post ig.

not always, same as they shouldn't always win. The point is that numbers shouldn't have as much effect as they do now. You can see how grumpy had a winning streak while they had the most whales but someone came and built an even bigger whale farm and now suddenly grumpy isn't so invincible anymore. But what we need to look at is that the only way they could beat a mid sized group of whales is by building an even bigger group of whales and that's just poor game design because it puts certain mega alliances in a seemingly invincible position where they can only be threatened if you somehow manage to be bigger than them.

Yes actually, and if you're confused as to why I think they're related, I believe that players resort to nuking because there is no other viable way to fight a larger group of enemies, you are always going to lose against numbers. In an ideal game where players will be able to fight conventionally without being overwhelmed by sheer numbers there wouldn't as much need to go on a nuke spree and we'd only have players like Hatebi who'd nuke regardless doing it. Most players nuke because they have to not because this is an op strategy with no counters or repercussions, this is why CoA chose to nuke Hollywood for their MDP with Ro$e or UU had to nuke KT for their raids, if they had any chance on conventional they would have done that instead. That is all. Yes alliances have differences but that the top the alliances that dictate the game they're more similar than different.