Leaderboard

Hear Yea Hear Yea, my name is Cob. I am the perpetual "not quite FA Gov" member of TKR, and it was my idea to start the meme war with Aurora. Yes, that meme war that no one cares about anymore. I am digging it up from the grave to declare that we won. Thank you, that is all. You may now go back to your boring lives. TL;DR TKR wins and Aurora Sucks Signatures Benfro-TKR Queen Yzard- The real Leader of Aurora (Yes you signed it, no you don't remember doing so. Oh well this isn't a scam)

Hi Jaden can you please make the video bigger thanks

https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=351662 This should be pretty straightforward.

Ladies and gentlemen, it has been confirmed. The chocolate is melted.

wow, pretty crazy that one man holds gov or leadership positions in 8 alliances...and is well-known on all of them to boot!

Melting the Chocolate Castle Knights Templar has always been known as an order that strives for excellence, competence, and faith. There have been times when decadent and stagnant alliances have been left alone as our focus can only be at one place at any single time. That time has come to an end. There are many alliances that require correction and guidance and we cannot simply ignore them any longer. Knights Templar, like God, is loving and forgiving. We exist to provide assistance to as many as we feasibly can. However, as with everything, some leaders are irredeemable and too far gone. Chocolate Castle is one of those groups that has fallen into decadence and sin. The gluttonous rulers spend all day eating an assortment of mint, Hershey, and Lindt chocolate ignoring the pleas of the faithful. They have set up a heretical anti-pope with flagrant disregard for our faith with intent to manipulate the belief in our Lord. There is only one response to this sort of blasphemous and malicious act. We have to melt the rotten chocolate castle to the ground. This is our holy mission and sacred duty and only the pious Knights Templar can bring them the light. Deus Vult!

"Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's" The Legion is always looking for spectacular fun. As an 16 year old community we have seen many conflicts. The Legion is resilient where others have shattered upon the field of battle. We have been warmly welcomed to Orbis by the community. Now it is time to bring the fun! The Knights Templar seeks to join us in glorious battle, who are we to refuse? Our Legion is sound, our shields steady. Ave Legio! Oh... we also get to use our war flag now so that is pretty cool.

GG TKR is better we suck and lose everything ☹️ pity us by sending our bank $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

i think Prima Victoria won

9convert.com_-_Didnt_ask_Dont_care_plus_Youre_white_Martin_Cabello_III.mp4

No but I have considered crusading. Say Hi to Red for me.

Oh my god, you've cracked the code. This is damning evidence. Alex cannot overlook this for a second more. 😳

No, you haven't, this has been brought up at least a half dozen times before. These are not multis, they all use borgs bot, Locutus, for banking operations. This has been vetted and cleared repeatedly, and Alex should really put up a post it note somewhere for people.

Hello, I am someone who is looking for my queries to be answered because I don’t want to get in trouble for it; so here is the list of questions I would like to ask: What should I do about me and my brother playing the game on the same network? What can I, and can I not do once me and my brother are verified? Can me and my brother be in the same alliance? Can me being in a senior cabinet position within my alliance and having access to the alliance bank be allowed to be in the same alliance as my brother and give him grants only when I think he deserves them? please can someone come back with all of the answers as soon as possible you can reach out to me; ingame - Newer England owned by Winston Hastings Discord - MasterJay05#2457

So this is why you invited me out for a drink... Too bad you got the wrong secret leader. Our real secret leader is *bang!* *Gurgling noises*

Fantastic, simply marvelous.

We as TKR desperately needed this Ego boost. Can't go 3 months without a win for us you know?

ggwp

One time I tried a beer that had habanero in it and really just didn't do it for me so I'm gonna go ahead and not imagine spicy chocolate because I dunno it's probably a similar vibe.

There was a meme war?

Ave

I appreciate the opportunity to gain experience. My navy was bored of bombing random Islands anyway. For the Honor of Greninja! Ave Legio!

Therefore welcome one another as Christ has welcomed you, for the glory of God. - Romans 15:7 The Knights Templar formally welcome The Legion into the realm of Politics and War. Existing as a community for 15 years is no small task, and it’s an honour to have such a group join us here on Orbis. We hope that The Legion will have a fun and engaging time here in the game! Having grown to large size in a relatively short time, it is regretful to see that The Legion does not yet have much experience in this game, and hasn't had much opportunity to gain any. And already being in the top 15 alliances by score, it is even more regretful to see that they are virtually completely unknown to the world at large, and have yet to make their mark. We believe that this alliance would greatly benefit from the chance to let their name and existence be known to all, and to gather valuable PnW experience both as a community and as individuals. I'd say this is an alliance well overdue for a welcome party - KT style. As it is our Christian duty to be generous and hospitable to those who are most in need of aid, we shall therefore provide for them this opportunity! Allow us to introduce to the world stage: The Legion! Sorry for not having any overlap with your massively oversized low tier, one can only hope someone else gives them the chance to gain some experience soon!

I'm not being a harsh critique here but you'd want to actually declare a war or two before posting an RoH usually. Edit: Just saw your embargo blitz. Good job on that one.

They will stumble repeatedly; they will fall over each other. They will say, ‘Get up, let us go back to our own people and our native lands, away from the sword of the oppressor.’ Jeremiah 46:16 BEHOLD! The prophets have spoken

lol have you considered stand up?

I like very annoying, egotistical, teenage white girl alliances how I like my chocolate. I don't like chocolate.

this alone is a CB https://gyazo.com/1c20acea7248c4d7e2f2ce747285df41

Aww, how sweet. 💗

Honestly in a way this is the least toxic thing PnW has done

Eating mint chocolate is a valid cb.

I never have, and never will charge taxes in my alliance, with that being said, even I think that is a terrible idea.

Do I need to go through years of old posts to find the dozens of examples exactly why that's so monumentally stupid? Cause it's seeming like someone has to because the same few do-little fools keep bringing it up like it's brilliant. Also, that's basically how Alex has said to do alliance-wide embargoes anyway for years now, and he's been told repeatedly how mind numbingly moronic and detached from the actual reality of running alliances that is.

And yet you can't deny that the first two numbers of each of their creation date years are "2" and "0." Coincidence? I think not. And the third number is either a "1" or a "2." Harsh evidence, my friend.

Ah yes, Sri is actually the shadow leader of half a dozen other alliances, thank you for exposing his plot to fund his new cities 😉

Here's a recording of Royal Orbis Radio, courtesy of Thalmor.

KT:

Alex, I have found a list of Multis. The Leader of Space Invaders Sri Lanka 001 has links to every nation. https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=129454 Unique ID Link: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/unique/id=129454

Hey guys, Adding the ability for alliance leaders to embargo other alliances on behalf of their alliance. This suggestion has been floating around for years, and I have seen this come up on P&W Radios etc. I really think it can work if reasonably added to the game and here is why: Much more efficient than individual members each embargoing an alliance. Adds a greater dynamic to politics and diplomacy in the game. Third-sphere argument: Two spheres are at war, and they wish to prevent a third sphere from growing too fast whilst the war rages. They simply embargo the third sphere. Allows alliances to place economic pressure on the alliance/sphere they are at war with. Allows third party alliances (allies who are not in war) to place economic strain on your allies enemy. Or allows alliances to specifically back one sphere by embargoing the other. Counter-arguments: Embargo system can be abused by alliance leaders. Limit alliances to 5-10 embargoes each. This should leave the global market very much open to alliance trade for members. Too many embargoes made by alliances can place large strain on the global market. Again, 5-10 embargoes max each alliance. Yes, this will place some strain on the market, however this will make the politics game much more interesting. We already have an embargo system in place. Yes, but only for members, which is frustrating inefficient to coordinate between multiple alliances and spheres. Hope this could be considered. Thanks, Kosta.

@ZephyrWith every respect to you Zephyr, I must disagree. Your suggestions, although advocate for greater individual freedoms for members would work in a real life setting, however in Politics and War would make it a complete nightmare to run an alliance. This seems to be your interpretation of the game premise, and one that I 100% disagree with. If members were able to refuse actions such a taxes, embargoes, and sharing information (I know information sharing is already a mechanic, however it is not a problem because not many players know about it) it would be incredibly difficult to govern an alliance. Your premise would work if Politics and War were a full time job however your premise allows for zero mechanical governance by alliance leaders. Currently alliances have only one proper mechanical tool for governance and that tool is taxes. Taxes can have multiple uses however one such use is punitive. If members are able to refuse taxes, it defeats one of the important middle-grounds of punishment for inactive/non-compliant members. Instead the only way governments can deal with non-compliance is alliance removal, since taxes are "opt-in". Again, if Politics and War war was a full time job your premise would work. Would you expect an alliance leaders to physically ask every single member what their stockpile is? what their spy count is? If their compliant with embargoes? Are they paying their taxes? What a complete waste of time. We can literally see their information on the control panel. And also we can see their nations. If members had the option to cancel that information it would be a ridiculous task to coordinate. I am advocating for all governments here. Its simply not viable. Your are advocating for a system of zero mechanical control by governments except for being able to kick members which WILL NOT work. And before anyone swings the "tyranny" hammer my way. TF is looking to democratise in the future. And if Zephyr's model were implemented, it would be a complete nightmare any govt of the alliance. Perhaps alliances with bots could make things easier, but not every alliance has that luxury. TL;DR I disagree on most points.

Can you like. Declare war before I retire next time? Good luck.