Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/07/19 in all areas

  1. This is Shifty bringing you more details of just how far this happy family is actually a horror story. Who could this Silent be? Merging seems chill... Hey hey hey, no one talks about my Dusty like that Ahhhh, so that's who woulda merged Hey wait Shifty how did you get all this Solar info? Well I got it from second, third, fourth, fifth hand sources The info has been passed around like yer mum but where did it come from? ah well... Who's really behind all of this? Is BK sphere's greatest enemy really KETOGG, Rose, Chaos, and Alex who favors those damn whales? Or is it from within like when you can't shit, but the shit is giving you really bad gas and cramps. Kinda like what Cobber posts about on the daily. This is Shifty, reminding you that the difference between a sphere and Round Table Pizza™ is that the pizza can actually be enjoyed by a group of 4 or more.
    9 points
  2. Hi. I'm the one that called your leaders deranged. I meant in game; you make deranged decisions. I also called you disingenuous. I have reasons for saying these things that are in character, so I do. For example: considering you disliked my post where I pointed out BK's head laughs about people being driven out of the game, I assume that you are only pretending to be concerned about these things when you can accuse other people of them for in game political points, and as such are full of it. You also recently referred to Quichwe as acting like a douchebag: there is really no consistent frame of reference that excuses that as okay, but sees your own leaders being called "deranged" as some totally unacceptable injustice. You revel in toxicity, as long as it's yours.
    7 points
  3. Pointing out your dishonesty is not "toxicity". Though I'm sure that will be a common CB for your hegemony going forward. It's much better than the secret agreements and made up logs you used for this war. Instead of responding to memes you don't like why not actually address what Adrienne said earlier and that you and Roq ignored. You seem to have a habit of focusing on nonsense and ignoring actual rebuttals to your claims: "I’ve been told your “source” is WSxPhoenix and that I told her I had plans to roll you after this war ended. If this is indeed your source, this is a blatant falsehood but I shouldn’t be surprised considering I’ve been shown logs of you delivering more detailed falsehoods about me with even less factual basis. For the record, this is the only conversation I’ve had with her regarding the war and your sphere. We talked a little more about BK and the leaks afterwards but I’m fairly certain nothing in this conversation was deleted as you claim. WSxPhoenix06/17/2019 Speaking of sharing Aren't you concerned you guys might get hit by NPO/t$? Adrienne06/17/2019 If we do, at least we've gone out in a blaze of glory The amount of f*cks I have to give are astonishingly low"
    4 points
  4. I was thinking more along the lines of visiting lovely, picturesque villages. Pictured above is Edam, a peaceful and quiet place I visited a bit ago, about half an hour’s drive off of Amsterdam. Not so much a “spiritual” retreat as it would be a normal vacation, but I could always dress up as a weird religious leader to make it realistic. ?
    4 points
  5. I mean really, lets not come on here and try to put Camelot down without proof of this being Epi ... I strongly recall unfavorable leaks about other people a short while ago and I'm not referring to the BK / tCW ones
    4 points
  6. The game is very lame with species, using the Earth-neutral noun "human" that extraterrestrials detest. It might be nice to be able to specify species; i.e, to state that you are an ayy lmao, nematode, crabman, or android from 2142 and force the game to use the relevant nouns.
    3 points
  7. I think the lesson here is, if you have an anime thing as your avatar, you're probably a garbage.
    3 points
  8. The new, VIP only mass infra purchase button is a great idea. I have VIP expressly for this reason, and I will likely continue to have it for during and post war infra management... However, one issue I've noticed is that it only allows you to bring all to a single level; this means both buying AND selling infra. As such, if I try to buy up to a point that's below the city with the highest infra, it gives an error since I would have to sell improvements for selling infra to be valid. I can see two options for this; the most useful would be to have a tick box next to each city to confirm which actions to perform. In this way, you can go through and buy in a number of cities, but not have to worry about all 26 at once. Perhaps easier would be to have mass buying and selling separately; that is, not having sales and purchases happening at once. I believe this would improve the system to being widely useful in and immediately after war, and will help those who don't have the income to deal with all cities at once. -zig
    2 points
  9. So I was considering something, and I think I realized something really interesting. All the intended parties(BK, TCW, TGH, KT, TKR, CoS, and NPO) all achieved their war goals with this war, albeit at different times of the war. KT/TGH/TKR wanted to incapacitate BK sphere for targeting them. They are, and you could honestly say that FA-wise, they lost a lot of allies and meatshields, so this war crippled their FA pull. BK/TCW wanted to incapacitate the 2 smaller spheres, they did so, they achieved their goals as KTsphere and Chaos can’t realistically fight them anytime soon. NPO wanted to incapacitate KTsphere and Chaos from being able to roll NSOsphere post war. While their may be smaller things, this is what every sphere wanted. Sooooo why can’t everyone end the war and move on? It’s literally gotten to the point where everyone won what they wanted.
    2 points
  10. Its funny so many approved and yet Alex didnt listen he ignored us for too long. Now we rise up once more. As stated in the post above Water would serve as a food like resource with modifications. It would be needed in order for the nation to properly function like you see with food. It can also be traded like any resource in the Market. Here are some ideas with what you can also do with water. Water would be produced via Water Pumps which would be worth one improvement slot each. Power Hydroelectric Power Plants - this would turn water into elecriticty similiar to Oil, Coal and Nuclear Plants. Hydroelectric Power Plants are the most efficent power sources. Costs to build hydroelectric plants should be high but maintaining one should be pretty low as it would be irl. Nuclear Cooling - water would be used in order to keep Nuclear Power Plants at a safe level, a small amount of water would be used as to not make running nuclear power plants not worthwhile. If a nation doesnt have water the Nuclear Power Plant will shut down not being able to produce power until water is bougnt with a small chance of an explosion occuring which would destroy the Power Plant, destroy 300 to 700 infra, and give radation levels similiar to a nuke in the city. Military Water would be also used to keep Military Troops well maintained and operational. If troops dont have enough water they will be unusable like an actual military force would. Disease/Pollution Once a city reaches a certain size, water would began acting polluted and would raise disease and pollution levels, to combat this players would need to build Water Treatment Centers to combat this, they would work similiar to how Recycling Centers, Hospitals, and Police Stations work and the ratio of water pumps to treatment would be between 6:1 to 10:1. Projects Water Reclamation Plant - This would cost one project slot and once built will boost water production in every city buy an additional 25%, they would have no affect on water pollution rates. It would also be fairly cheap. If you have any more ideas with water please feel free to shate them.
    2 points
  11. May I request clarification on what exactly determines if two players are multis, @Alex? I was under the impression that two players on the same IP are perfectly legal in the game unless they begin trading with each other or start mucking around with each other. Victor and Jalisco here are brothers playing from home, hence the same IP here, and at the very minimum, with how much Jalisco flames the hell out of me, they're very different people. As an edit, I checked the game rules, and this was what is said: Exactly what proof here is that the nations are multis if you've not even gotten the other side of the story?
    2 points
  12. If P&W players wish to go on a spiritual retreat, I might be willing to fund it. ?
    2 points
  13. Camelot was among the more reliable & helpful BK allies when I was there if I recall. Felt like there was some loyalty there while in BK at least & they’d help if asked. Good luck to them whatever they end up doing.
    2 points
  14. Are you doubting her ability to be an evil untrustworthy mastermind because she's female? Wow.
    2 points
  15. I secretly like to give him shit so that he continues to go darker. I find these shitty news network posts good for the community. Just don't tell him that.
    2 points
  16. 2 points
  17. Best of luck on your new endeavor
    2 points
  18. 69/10 water should be already in-game. But Africa shouldn't be able to have water.
    2 points
  19. Hmmmmmm. Until TCW's military reputation is restored? Until Citadel establishes itself as an independent political force? Until IQ stops being IQ? ... oh dear.
    2 points
  20. Currently, if you win a nation vs nation war, you have no dictation over what happens next. Often, the beige timer that your opponent is going to get will leave them better off than if you didn't win the war at all- especially if there's no money to loot. Instead, I would suggest that as part of the act of winning a war, the victor should be able to declare terms. These terms could include all the things that currently happen, and more (and these are just ideas and examples); Loot from the nation, Loot from the alliance bank, Not being able to declare new wars for a period of time, Enforced debt (i.e. a portion of the opponents tax income is taken and handed to the victor until it is paid off), Not being able to buy military units above a certain percentage for some time, Forcible conscription of some opposing surviving military units, Destruction of infrastructure, Destruction of improvements (at random, so we can't forcibly choose hangars or power plants). A beige timer would still exist, but the number of turns spent in beige would depend on the harshness of the terms inflicted. Therefore, if you won the war, and you chose to not attach terms, the beige timer should be relatively short (for example, 6 turns). If you won the war and decided to inflict as many terms as possible, the beige timer would be much longer. The value of the terms inflicted, and thus the length of the beige timer, should be capped at no more than the percentage of resistance you won the war by. If you won by 6 resistance or less, you wouldn't be able to select any terms; if you won by 20, you'd be able to select maybe one thing, if you won by 50, something harsher, etc. These changes are one possible idea, I'm sure there's other better ones to be thought of.
    1 point
  21. I've gotten a bunch of PMs about this already. It's very clear to me that it's the same person operating both nations based on: Similar activity patterns Multiple matching IP addresses Frequent use of the same browser (I'm not talking "Google Chrome" here, I can pull device info, browser version, etc. to get a pretty specific fingerprint from users based on how they're accessing the game.) Extremely similar e-mail addresses (think [email protected] and [email protected]) It's against the rules to have multiple nations, regardless of whether you're interacting or not. People who think that they can get away with having multis just because they're not trading between the two nations are wrong, and will be caught eventually.
    1 point
  22. Don't play the victim card here. Chaos planning roll NPO is not a case of different political views. Its plain lie your alliance keeps repeating. Whats the point of discussing things with pacificans if they live in post factual world?
    1 point
  23. Sorry to interup your fantasy about Chaos rolling everyone. After 2 months of NPO explaining how black is white there is no other conclusion.
    1 point
  24. Y'all need to go out into the desert, take some peyote and go on a spirit journey. Something. Cuz y'all need some guidance from the great spirits.
    1 point
  25. I'm glad you agree. You used to be entertaining and good. Now its just fun to laugh at you for trying.
    1 point
  26. Definitely multis, thanks for the report! They've been banned.
    1 point
  27. They're both Verified (you'll notice the blue checkmarks on their nation pages) so they've been manually verified as independent persons. Therefore they're not in violations of the multi rules. However, I'll look into the war declaration reason issue.
    1 point
  28. Hey everyone, this Friday at 7 pm Pacific time (10 Eastern) we are having a special edition of my radio show, Prime Time Booty Time! This episode will feature: Me and Kimmy being our usual great selves Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet Ronny D's triumphant return Me complaining about the stat sheet still being down Advertisements (that are really disses on other alliances that I didn't get paid for tbh) Live rapping maybe a little bit of crying ... and more! I also plan to talk about why I think that Coalition B is in for a little bit of a disappointing surprise when it comes to war performance. That could be interesting too. Finally, I am just about done with my diss track on Charlie Traveler. It will be released Friday or before then. Please send thoughts and prayers to Charlie. Cool, that's about all. Hope that you guys listen in. The show will be on the Factory Fresh Media discord (which may or may not be owned by the guy that I'm releasing a diss track on).
    1 point
  29. Do tell me more? I'm yet to see BK/tCW argue for the disbandment of any of Coalition A alliances with serious intent. Throughout Knightfall, there was never a serious discussion on disbandment of alliances. I mean its something we haven't ever posted in public or privately pushed and I haven't seen it pushed. But if you have proof, feel free to bring it forward and I'll gladly repudiate those comments Lol that is an interesting spin but utterly pointless and silly. Our sales of infra was because we knew it'd be wrecked given we're eating beiges. So we might as well lose it. The NPO specifically compressed scores not because of GoB but given the range of 21+ cities and their larger numbers in coalition A in round 1. Since then we've gone upwards and sitting pretty at score ranges we were before the war. The same with the rest of the coalition. With regards for coming for GoB. We are
    1 point
  30. Your name perfectly describes this idea, tbh.
    1 point
  31. tfw no big tiddie @Epi gf :(((
    1 point
  32. And what this picture fails to show is the 300+ nations you have sitting right below that at 20 cities.
    1 point
  33. Oh I don't know Roq. You had a secret alliance with the sphere you supposedly broke from while you both were the two largest groupings. You backstabbed your own ally to defend your former ally. You had your narratives for hitting GOB/Guardian prepared and ready before we ever hit BK. (And they were bullshit) You were in talks with BKsphere about hitting us. You only enforce your arbitrary "balancing attempts" on people not called BK. Apparently BK with their 900 nations hitting Chaos isn't worthy of your benevolent intervention. No you'd rather hit KETOGG instead. Which is why your attempt to retroactively justify your shit with "it was just to keep balance" falls flat.
    1 point
  34. Well I gave it a try, probably stayed at it too long. If you genuinely believe this about me and the argument I’m making you’re too far gone down a pit of intransigence. If anyone wants to continue talking, you can find me on discord. Good chatting with you @Shadowthrone and @Edward I.
    1 point
  35. I mean, if that's the way you want to see it that's fine, but if you're going to quote to our toxic moments constantly and then meme our genuine outreach then you've shown just exactly how little we should expect when we dedicate energy to dialogue.
    1 point
  36. First and foremost, I honestly don’t give a damn what NPO does for their own. However, that certainly won’t stop me from criticizing you folks either when you’re doing exactly what you’ve complained or criticized others for. Such as building a hegemony through secret treaties. You and others have said otherwise, but your actions contradict your statements. You missed a prime opportunity by joining the conflict. You would’ve noticed KETOG and Chaos going their own separate ways. You would’ve seen that neither of us pursue your “mini sphere”. And you would’ve kept at least amicable (or better) relations with those you normally haven’t. We were very straightforward and clear with you, and we kept our word. However, certain others have not... —————— Just to clarify something. No, we’re not looking to force any treaty break ups, or formations of them. No, we’re not looking at perma war for the sake of scorch earth. If anything, the damage is already done on both sides. However, we will continue to fight, raid, and pillage.
    1 point
  37. Thrax is right about this. @Edward I - Let’s try not to ignore the context to what provoked Sketchy’s comment. NPO was given the benefit of the doubt, multiple times, and... well... you acted. His comments come after your actions. And while I don’t back any terms or forced methods of separating (or creating) treaty ties, I certainly do back him on his cynical attitude towards NPO and BK. There’s absolutely no reason to trust you folks now at the moment. (Also lol@BK and their ties being a minisphere) Fixed it for you.
    1 point
  38. Your leader sat in a coalition channel last war laughing about making players quit. Far be it from me to suggest slursphere isn't toxic: they're slursphere. But you're in the same boat.
    1 point
  39. Uhm. Edit: let's also bear in mind that minispheres was not some contrived plot dreamed up by the rest of the game to try and pigeon-hole NPO. That's just paranoid and silly. What it was, was something that your allies in t$ pushed as their rationale for their FA moves. I can't tell you what the comms you had with t$ were; maybe you guys were very upfront about thinking their entire idea for signing them was stupid? But I'm sure I wasn't the only person who was assured NPO was ready to break from IQ, and I have trouble thinking of a better scenario for you guys to have done it if you really had a mind to. Ergo, I conclude you never really had that intent. That's my reasoning, and I think it's pretty sensible honestly. There's a pretty large amount of back channel stuff that does not look good for your alliance's intent as well. Far more than that cobbled together mess you guys tried to pull on TKR. If I send bitter on that point, well yes. I am. As someone who was actually bored with IQ vs not-IQ bipolarity, it sucks having your side parrot that intent only to fall back into it instantly and deliberately.
    1 point
  40. @Memph, Apparently you haven't heard: The True The Vanguard is completely and utterly victorious over the false Polaris. Their might knows no bounds, their greatness is heard across Orbis. They bring justice on swift wings to those pretenders, those slanderers, those withering liars in the false Polaris. They who pretend to carry the great banner of The True The Vanguard cannot hide behind their fake news any longer. The Fake Polaris claims to be dignified, to be enduring, but their foolish leadership continuously builds their infra beyond what any sane nation ought to do. They provoke the wrath of The True The Vanguard over and over again by building further and further into the score range of their enemies. With their bank looted and the beiges rolling in, they have surely been brought low once and for all. They claim independence but they bow at the feet of their hamster overlord in secret meetings. They have no free will, no dignity, and no honor. The True The Vanguard has shown them just how sensitive and desperate for a safe space they are. Tl;dr: The Fake Polaris cannot hope to contend with how awesome The True The Vanguard is. They need to get over themselves.
    1 point
  41. This is just copy paste from Facebook with out any editing effort. But since we have so many communist alliances, then ....
    1 point
  42. The whole site, game, everything.
    1 point
  43. How many times can I say it? Ask Alexio!
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.