Leaderboard

This is a compilation of all the memes that happened last year, or at least the most important ones. We tried to include as many as possible, but you can't fit every single one without going insane Thanks to @Abbas Mehdi , @Buorhann , @Thalmor , @Settra , @TheNG Rising for helping a lot with the memes, the video took many days and over 40 man hours. Strap up, grab your popcorn..

This is how Godovanko's work should be enjoyed. Lawd ?

You missed the gems in this thread, though

I feel like the biggest problem of our FA right now is being liked by you

That intro with Madden, 10\10.

Scanning...... Value determined 2018 Youtube Rewind<PnW Year Review

Ok, this is epic.

Who's Polaris?

Shhh, only likes now

??year review

It's no more a joke than you are

Notice how we can watch this but not the twerk video...

Alrighty now i got some time on my hands So my major issue with this is your want to nerf raiding, while i understand the bit about the nation being inactive, the simple fact of the game is, because of alliances sizes and treaties most raiders cant just hit anyone and profit. I think raiding is a very valid tatic and in fact keeps nations / alliances on there toes so im not really in favor of ending it. However i do agree that there should be a incentive to log in more, but id do something more like bonuses 1. After 100 days you get 15 mil 2. After 365 days you get 100 mil + in a ingame award 3. After 2 years ect....

Neat, one of my memes made the cut. Excellent video boys

Alright, that made me laugh quite a bit. Great Job

Nope, no upvotes from me

Hey, I understood some of these references.

You forgot to mention that Gorge merged into Cornerstone.

I like the idea of the project, but I agree that the air defense per ship should be 1:2. The cost seems reasonable as well =] Disclaimer: I am not Goomy

Excess? There is no excess; we need all of those treaties in order to accurately reflect the bond our alliances have with each other :B

There does need to be a tutorial that explains how to play in terms of the actual meta. The issue however is, plenty of people join alliances they know can provide benefits when they are interested in the benefits. There were several top ten alliances that advertised extensive grants and such. The ones who don't aren't necessarily doing so because they think they can get an equal value in a smaller alliance. They want something where it feels more personal to them. The meta has a very limited appeal despite having a cult following and very few people will be interested in the inside baseball. However, all the game has to offer is the political meta, raiding, wars that can seem pointless or just accumulation of stuff. Epi had it right on the mark that the requirements to get into a serious alliance are usually higher and include installing a secondary app and following rules and waiting to be useful. For most people there's a stress of obligation vs fun trade off and the game doesn't offer a lot of fun for people who as aren't interested in being part of the player-created meta so they aren't willing to take on the stress of playing seriously especially when they're expected to go through an application process for a game as the first thing they do. There were a lot of decent ideas in Statekraft and it would be good if some of them could be incorporated here or something else that gives an added dimension to the game if people want newer players to have a stake in playing seriously.

Shitpost or not, it can be easily argued that canceling on KT is justifiable both ethically and legally.

I'm not disputing planes are king, I'm disputing the logic that they shouldn't be. Noone complains that the Queen is too powerful in chess and needs to be nerfed because of it, the understanding is that the queen is a powerful unit that should be protected at all costs and used carefully and responsibly. A balance of power between navy, ground and air just turns the combat system into a rock paper scissors simulator. That being said, sheepy should have retooled score values for units ages ago back when he agreed with the suggestion in like 2016. IF you want to "fix" the imbalance, simply increase the score value of planes and reduce the score values of tanks so they are more representative. Tanks are heavily neutered by their cost/power ratio and their overinflated score. Addressing the latter issue would be easy enough.

There is no reason to nerf planes. Mechanically planes already lose wars against all the other unit types. Ground attacks and ships both beige faster than planes so there isn’t a point into making planes even weaker. The presented scenarios is extremely unlikely in a real war as it is. Additionally since this is a project it effectively is buffing the largest players, the exact opposite of who should actually being buffed.

Are you the TKR sphere version of noctis? Because you're acting about as intelligent as he is, and that's one of the meanest things I've said this week.

I vote yes on it I could see it being used when you have a plane double buy stacked and you get 3 buddies to counter someone. Easily could turn an update airstrike into a closer match up which would be enough to prevent another enemy airstrike or at least make them lose, get Pyrrhic, or moderate. You can always strike away at ships and planes with spies too. (albeit slower)

That one alliance that kicks everyone that slightly offends them from their discord and never posts memes? ?

>You're incorrect >Delay 1-2 attacks >Each MAP is literally 2 hours of real time >An airstrike is 4 MAPs Ok, I'm "incorrect" with my assessment of giving the player a chance to get on before he's zeroed out and cannot have a chance to regain control, or able to use his units.

I'm not trying to solve any problems, I'm looking to add new content and create more and different scenarios. At some point, the war system just gets repetitive due to simplicity - adding different strategy options makes the game more interesting (and fun) in my opinion, versus the same rigid playstyles. This is the point that I think needs to be emphasized here - this thread has basically derailed into a "how to completely change the war system" thread which is not at all the point of this suggestion. Adding this project is a very minor expansion to the existing mechanics, and ultimately if you don't like it, you don't have to use it. So long as it isn't overpowered and gamebreaking, I'm of the opinion that more options > less options.

Do relax, gentlemen. It's not like resolving the problem here will have any real impact in the real world, so just enjoy the debate in a civilized manner.

Everyone that voted Fraggle for that award is just jealous tbh

Empyrea are big boys, they can handle their own business. Our only concern was the Protector protecting a Protector protecting a Protectorate then later having another Protectorate signing to join in as well. In other words, the dumb shit. The super sekrit treaty request from Camelot to Empyrea didn’t bother us much, the poaching we didn’t care, but the potential escalation due to dumb treaty chess with Protectorates is what caught our attention.

Biggest flaw of your whole argument. [1] What your side doesn't seem to realize is that you saying its a non issue doesn't make it one. The mere fact that you want to hold on to it so stubbornly only highlights how much you are stealing from others. If you are choosing to have the bot over all these days of lost income it must be very important. [2] There are four alliances on each side who can talk? I am not sure what spin your hearing from your government, but the delays are not because of too many voices. You also seem to have no grasp on what a coalition is. [3] And give you guys a break? Any act of kindness is misconstrued as weakness by your negotiators so nothing of the sort will be done. "Last minute blitzes" affecting the peace process makes it seem equitable, when really people want to hit that loot piñata one last time. Shhh I want to see more.

Clash of the Knight(s)

one of the all time great DoWs

I knew you all loved us, I just didn't know how much. Enjoy the fight, IQ.

Why.. Now that's upvote abuse

Would you be "nice" to people who attack you? Probably not.

So here I get punished when as I stated, these guys all provoked me and they get nothing? Just to point out the obvious, had they not violated the rules to do what they've done, I never would have been pushed far enough to respond the way I did. You legit sat there and allowed those people to attack me and violate several rules including turning a report thread into a discussion thread full of insulting, mockery, trolling, harassment, and bullying, and you do nothing. Still to this moment you continue to stand by and do nothing about the continued down voting abuse that I was reporting about. Then your moderator, rather than deleting the replies that shouldn't even have been there in the first place, locked the thread and failed to answer/respond to the subject at hand the report itself.. It was pure harassment and bullying that you allowed and did nothing about. Legal options will be pursued. Thanks.

As soon as you exit yourself from this thread that you don't belong posting in.

Hah and you claim to be Christian/Catholic or whatever and go to church every Sunday to beg forgiveness for your bullying sins? Haha you're a joke.

Ok, and you just proved my theory that TGH, KT, and TKR are toxic alliances that are a hindrance on the future of this game and it's growth potential.

And she broke your throne and she cut your hair

Hallelujah, hallelujah... Hallelujah, halleluu-ooooo-jah

OMG... IT'S "REALLY" ***** You need step up your game Curu But you don't really care for music, do you?

Isn't better having this for tanks instead of ships? Ships are already very powerfull (more res and blockade) while tanks are less powerfull than air and ships but cost more If you have max ground and the enemy has max air he can destroy your tanks while you can only destroy infra and loot money So converting like 250 tanks in one aircraft would be nice